TY - JOUR
T1 - EDUCATE
T2 - An international, randomized controlled trial for teaching electrocardiography
AU - Kashou, Anthony H.
AU - Noseworthy, Peter A.
AU - Beckman, Thomas J.
AU - Anavekar, Nandan S.
AU - Cullen, Michael W.
AU - Angstman, Kurt B.
AU - Sandefur, Benjamin J.
AU - Shapiro, Brian P.
AU - Wiley, Brandon W.
AU - Kates, Andrew M.
AU - Sadhu, Justin
AU - Thakker, Prashanth
AU - Huneycutt, David
AU - Braisted, Andrew
AU - Smith, Stephen W.
AU - Baranchuk, Adrian
AU - Grauer, Ken
AU - O'Brien, Kevin
AU - Kaul, Viren
AU - Gambhir, Harvir Singh
AU - Knohl, Stephen J.
AU - Restrepo, Daniel
AU - May, Adam M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - Introduction: Despite the critical role of electrocardiograms (ECGs) in patient care, evident gaps exist in ECG interpretation competency among healthcare professionals across various medical disciplines and training levels. Currently, no practical, evidence-based, and easily accessible ECG learning solution is available for healthcare professionals. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of web-based, learner-directed interventions in improving ECG interpretation skills in a diverse group of healthcare professionals. Methods: In an international, prospective, randomized controlled trial, 1206 healthcare professionals from various disciplines and training levels were enrolled. They underwent a pre-intervention test featuring 30 12-lead ECGs with common urgent and non-urgent findings. Participants were randomly assigned to four groups: (i) practice ECG interpretation question bank (question bank), (ii) lecture-based learning resource (lectures), (iii) hybrid question- and lecture-based learning resource (hybrid), or (iv) no ECG learning resources (control). After four months, a post-intervention test was administered. The primary outcome was the overall change in ECG interpretation performance, with secondary outcomes including changes in interpretation time, self-reported confidence, and accuracy for specific ECG findings. Both unadjusted and adjusted scores were used for performance assessment. Results: Among 1206 participants, 863 (72 %) completed the trial. Following the intervention, the question bank, lectures, and hybrid intervention groups each exhibited significant improvements, with average unadjusted score increases of 11.4 % (95 % CI, 9.1 to 13.7; P<0.01), 9.8 % (95 % CI, 7.8 to 11.9; P<0.01), and 11.0 % (95 % CI, 9.2 to 12.9; P<0.01), respectively. In contrast, the control group demonstrated a non-significant improvement of 0.8 % (95 % CI, -1.2 to 2.8; P=0.54). While no differences were observed among intervention groups, all outperformed the control group significantly (P<0.01). Intervention groups also excelled in adjusted scores, confidence, and proficiency for specific ECG findings. Conclusion: Web-based, self-directed interventions markedly enhanced ECG interpretation skills across a diverse range of healthcare professionals, providing an accessible and evidence-based solution.
AB - Introduction: Despite the critical role of electrocardiograms (ECGs) in patient care, evident gaps exist in ECG interpretation competency among healthcare professionals across various medical disciplines and training levels. Currently, no practical, evidence-based, and easily accessible ECG learning solution is available for healthcare professionals. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of web-based, learner-directed interventions in improving ECG interpretation skills in a diverse group of healthcare professionals. Methods: In an international, prospective, randomized controlled trial, 1206 healthcare professionals from various disciplines and training levels were enrolled. They underwent a pre-intervention test featuring 30 12-lead ECGs with common urgent and non-urgent findings. Participants were randomly assigned to four groups: (i) practice ECG interpretation question bank (question bank), (ii) lecture-based learning resource (lectures), (iii) hybrid question- and lecture-based learning resource (hybrid), or (iv) no ECG learning resources (control). After four months, a post-intervention test was administered. The primary outcome was the overall change in ECG interpretation performance, with secondary outcomes including changes in interpretation time, self-reported confidence, and accuracy for specific ECG findings. Both unadjusted and adjusted scores were used for performance assessment. Results: Among 1206 participants, 863 (72 %) completed the trial. Following the intervention, the question bank, lectures, and hybrid intervention groups each exhibited significant improvements, with average unadjusted score increases of 11.4 % (95 % CI, 9.1 to 13.7; P<0.01), 9.8 % (95 % CI, 7.8 to 11.9; P<0.01), and 11.0 % (95 % CI, 9.2 to 12.9; P<0.01), respectively. In contrast, the control group demonstrated a non-significant improvement of 0.8 % (95 % CI, -1.2 to 2.8; P=0.54). While no differences were observed among intervention groups, all outperformed the control group significantly (P<0.01). Intervention groups also excelled in adjusted scores, confidence, and proficiency for specific ECG findings. Conclusion: Web-based, self-directed interventions markedly enhanced ECG interpretation skills across a diverse range of healthcare professionals, providing an accessible and evidence-based solution.
KW - ECG competency
KW - ECG education
KW - Healthcare professionals
KW - Medical education
KW - Online learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85182875760&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102409
DO - 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102409
M3 - Review article
C2 - 38232918
AN - SCOPUS:85182875760
SN - 0146-2806
VL - 49
JO - Current problems in cardiology
JF - Current problems in cardiology
IS - 3
M1 - 102409
ER -