TY - JOUR
T1 - Editorial Commentary
T2 - Your Surgical “Tool Box” Just Got a Little Bit Bigger
AU - Matava, Matthew
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Arthroscopy Association of North America
PY - 2016/8/1
Y1 - 2016/8/1
N2 - There is currently no “gold standard” for the surgical repair of a partial-thickness rotator cuff tear. Ranalletta et al. have made a meaningful contribution to the orthopaedic literature with this study that reports the clinical outcomes of 80 patients who underwent arthroscopic transtendon repair of high-grade, articular-sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. At a mean follow-up of 62 months, they noted significant improvement in pain, range of motion, and a number of objective shoulder outcome measures. Perhaps most importantly, 92.5% rated their shoulder as “good” or “excellent.” Unfortunately, we cannot definitively state whether or not these repairs actually healed given the lack of postoperative imaging, nor do we know the actual depth of these partial tears that can be difficult to objectively quantify. Despite these shortcomings, arthroscopic surgeons who treat rotator cuff disorders will be able to use this information in treating their patients irrespective of their preferred surgical technique. Future studies are needed to definitively determine which repair method, if any, is better.
AB - There is currently no “gold standard” for the surgical repair of a partial-thickness rotator cuff tear. Ranalletta et al. have made a meaningful contribution to the orthopaedic literature with this study that reports the clinical outcomes of 80 patients who underwent arthroscopic transtendon repair of high-grade, articular-sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. At a mean follow-up of 62 months, they noted significant improvement in pain, range of motion, and a number of objective shoulder outcome measures. Perhaps most importantly, 92.5% rated their shoulder as “good” or “excellent.” Unfortunately, we cannot definitively state whether or not these repairs actually healed given the lack of postoperative imaging, nor do we know the actual depth of these partial tears that can be difficult to objectively quantify. Despite these shortcomings, arthroscopic surgeons who treat rotator cuff disorders will be able to use this information in treating their patients irrespective of their preferred surgical technique. Future studies are needed to definitively determine which repair method, if any, is better.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990938509&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.05.016
DO - 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.05.016
M3 - Editorial
C2 - 27495859
AN - SCOPUS:84990938509
SN - 0749-8063
VL - 32
SP - 1529
EP - 1530
JO - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
JF - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
IS - 8
ER -