TY - JOUR
T1 - Does test-induced priming play a role in the creation of false memories?
AU - Marsh, Elizabeth J.
AU - McDermott, Kathleen B.
AU - Roediger, Henry L.
N1 - Funding Information:
Correspondence should be addressed to Elizabeth J. Marsh, Psychological and Brain Sciences, Duke University, 9 Flowers Drive, Box 90086, Durham, NC, 27708-0086, USA. Email: emarsh@psych.duke.edu We thank Ameet Parikh and Elyce Kirschenbaum for their assistance with data collection, and Kristina Olson for her help with data input. Keith Payne provided assistance with data analyses. We thank Dave Gallo for discussion of data and theory, and assistance with the ERTS program. This paper has benefited from the insightful reviews of Dan Wright and Alan Richardson-Klavehn. These data were presented at the 2000 meeting of the Psychonomic Society held in New Orleans. The first author was supported by an NRSA postdoctoral fellowship from the National Institute of Mental Health, #1F32MH12567, and the second author was supported by NIMH grant MH62514.
PY - 2004/1
Y1 - 2004/1
N2 - We investigated the role of test-induced priming in creating false memories in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm, in which subjects study lists of related words (bed, rest, awake) and then falsely recall or recognise a related word (sleep) on a later test. However, in experiments using three different procedures, we found that the number of related words tested prior to the critical word had surprisingly little impact on false recall and recognition. We manipulated the location of the critical item in tests of yes/no recognition, word-stem cued recall, and part-set cued recall. We consistently obtained high probabilities of false recall and recognition, but the probability was unaffected by the number of related items presented prior to the test of the critical item. Surprisingly, test-induced priming of the critical item does not seem to play a large role in this memory illusion.
AB - We investigated the role of test-induced priming in creating false memories in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm, in which subjects study lists of related words (bed, rest, awake) and then falsely recall or recognise a related word (sleep) on a later test. However, in experiments using three different procedures, we found that the number of related words tested prior to the critical word had surprisingly little impact on false recall and recognition. We manipulated the location of the critical item in tests of yes/no recognition, word-stem cued recall, and part-set cued recall. We consistently obtained high probabilities of false recall and recognition, but the probability was unaffected by the number of related items presented prior to the test of the critical item. Surprisingly, test-induced priming of the critical item does not seem to play a large role in this memory illusion.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0942266308&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09658210244000405
DO - 10.1080/09658210244000405
M3 - Review article
C2 - 15098620
AN - SCOPUS:0942266308
SN - 0965-8211
VL - 12
SP - 44
EP - 55
JO - Memory
JF - Memory
IS - 1
ER -