TY - JOUR
T1 - Does Point-of-Care Ultrasound Affect Fluid Resuscitation Volume in Patients with Septic Shock
T2 - A Retrospective Review
AU - Ablordeppey, Enyo A.
AU - Zhao, Amy
AU - Ruggeri, Jeffery
AU - Hassan, Ahmad
AU - Wallace, Laura
AU - Agarwal, Mansi
AU - Stickles, Sean P.
AU - Holthaus, Christopher
AU - Theodoro, Daniel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Enyo A. Ablordeppey et al.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background. Fixed, large volume resuscitation with intravenous fluids (IVFs) in septic shock can cause inadvertent hypervolemia, increased medical interventions, and death when unguided by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). The primary study objective was to evaluate whether total IVF volume differs for emergency department (ED) septic shock patients receiving POCUS versus no POCUS. Methods. We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study from 7/1/2018 to 8/31/2021 of atraumatic adult ED patients with septic shock. We agreed upon a priori variables and defined septic shock as lactate ≥4 and hypotension (SBP <90 or MAP <65). A sample size of 300 patients would provide 85% power to detect an IVF difference of 500 milliliters between POCUS and non-POCUS cohorts. Data are reported as frequencies, median (IQR), and associations from bivariate logistic models. Results. 304 patients met criteria and 26% (78/304) underwent POCUS. Cardiac POCUS demonstrated reduced ejection fraction in 15.4% of patients. Lung ultrasound showed normal findings in 53% of patients. The POCUS vs. non-POCUS cohorts had statistically significant differences for the following variables: higher median lactate (6.7 [IQR 5.2-8.7] vs. 5.6], p=0.003), lower systolic blood pressure (77.5 [IQR 61-86] vs. 85.0, p<0.001), more vasopressor use (51% vs. 34%, p=0.006), and more positive pressure ventilation (38% vs. 24%, p=0.017). However, there were no statistically significant differences between POCUS and non-POCUS cohorts in total IVF volume ml/kg (33.02 vs. 32.1, p=0.47), new oxygen requirement (68% vs. 59%, p=0.16), ED death (3% vs. 4%, p=0.15), or hospital death (31% vs. 27%, p=0.48). There were similar distributions of lactate, total fluids, and vasopressors in patients with CHF and severe renal failure. Conclusions. Among ED patients with septic shock, POCUS was more likely to be used in sicker patients. Patients who had POCUS were given similar volume of crystalloids although these patients were more critically ill. There were no differences in new oxygen requirement or mortality in the POCUS group compared to the non-POCUS group.
AB - Background. Fixed, large volume resuscitation with intravenous fluids (IVFs) in septic shock can cause inadvertent hypervolemia, increased medical interventions, and death when unguided by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). The primary study objective was to evaluate whether total IVF volume differs for emergency department (ED) septic shock patients receiving POCUS versus no POCUS. Methods. We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study from 7/1/2018 to 8/31/2021 of atraumatic adult ED patients with septic shock. We agreed upon a priori variables and defined septic shock as lactate ≥4 and hypotension (SBP <90 or MAP <65). A sample size of 300 patients would provide 85% power to detect an IVF difference of 500 milliliters between POCUS and non-POCUS cohorts. Data are reported as frequencies, median (IQR), and associations from bivariate logistic models. Results. 304 patients met criteria and 26% (78/304) underwent POCUS. Cardiac POCUS demonstrated reduced ejection fraction in 15.4% of patients. Lung ultrasound showed normal findings in 53% of patients. The POCUS vs. non-POCUS cohorts had statistically significant differences for the following variables: higher median lactate (6.7 [IQR 5.2-8.7] vs. 5.6], p=0.003), lower systolic blood pressure (77.5 [IQR 61-86] vs. 85.0, p<0.001), more vasopressor use (51% vs. 34%, p=0.006), and more positive pressure ventilation (38% vs. 24%, p=0.017). However, there were no statistically significant differences between POCUS and non-POCUS cohorts in total IVF volume ml/kg (33.02 vs. 32.1, p=0.47), new oxygen requirement (68% vs. 59%, p=0.16), ED death (3% vs. 4%, p=0.15), or hospital death (31% vs. 27%, p=0.48). There were similar distributions of lactate, total fluids, and vasopressors in patients with CHF and severe renal failure. Conclusions. Among ED patients with septic shock, POCUS was more likely to be used in sicker patients. Patients who had POCUS were given similar volume of crystalloids although these patients were more critically ill. There were no differences in new oxygen requirement or mortality in the POCUS group compared to the non-POCUS group.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85193924406&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1155/2024/5675066
DO - 10.1155/2024/5675066
M3 - Article
C2 - 38742136
AN - SCOPUS:85193924406
SN - 2090-2840
VL - 2024
JO - Emergency Medicine International
JF - Emergency Medicine International
M1 - 5675066
ER -