TY - JOUR
T1 - Does neuronal synchrony underlie visual feature grouping?
AU - Palanca, Ben J.A.
AU - DeAngelis, Gregory C.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Amy Wickholm and Heidi Loschen for excellent technical support and monkey training. We are grateful to Dora Angelaki, Tim Holy, Larry Snyder, Jacob Nadler, Ben Kolber, Jerry Nguyenkim, Yong Gu, Chris Fetsch, Vinod Rao, and Dan Christiansen for helpful comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the National Eye Institute (EY-013644), and by a Burroughs-Wellcome Career Award in the Biomedical Sciences (to G.C.D.). B.J.A.P. was supported by a Vision Sciences Training Grant from the NEI.
PY - 2005/4/21
Y1 - 2005/4/21
N2 - Previous research suggests that synchronous neural activity underlies perceptual grouping of visual image features. The generality of this mechanism is unclear, however, as previous studies have focused on pairs of neurons with overlapping or collinear receptive fields. By sampling more broadly and employing stimuli that contain partially occluded objects, we have conducted a more incisive test of the binding by synchrony hypothesis in area MT. We find that synchrony in spiking activity shows little dependence on feature grouping, whereas gamma band synchrony in field potentials can be significantly stronger when features are grouped. However, these changes in gamma band synchrony are small relative to the variability of synchrony across recording sites and do not provide a robust population signal for feature grouping. Moreover, these effects are reduced when stimulus differences nearby the receptive fields are eliminated using partial occlusion. Our findings suggest that synchrony does not constitute a general mechanism of visual feature binding.
AB - Previous research suggests that synchronous neural activity underlies perceptual grouping of visual image features. The generality of this mechanism is unclear, however, as previous studies have focused on pairs of neurons with overlapping or collinear receptive fields. By sampling more broadly and employing stimuli that contain partially occluded objects, we have conducted a more incisive test of the binding by synchrony hypothesis in area MT. We find that synchrony in spiking activity shows little dependence on feature grouping, whereas gamma band synchrony in field potentials can be significantly stronger when features are grouped. However, these changes in gamma band synchrony are small relative to the variability of synchrony across recording sites and do not provide a robust population signal for feature grouping. Moreover, these effects are reduced when stimulus differences nearby the receptive fields are eliminated using partial occlusion. Our findings suggest that synchrony does not constitute a general mechanism of visual feature binding.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17444384517&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.03.002
DO - 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.03.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 15848810
AN - SCOPUS:17444384517
SN - 0896-6273
VL - 46
SP - 333
EP - 346
JO - Neuron
JF - Neuron
IS - 2
ER -