Does gender affect experiences in the operating room for surgeons and anesthesiologists at a large academic center?

Melinda Staub, Britta Han, Angela Lee Hill, Emily Thomson, Jackie L. Martin, Russell Hoffmann, Tiffany M. Osborn, Molly McCormick, M. Allison Ogden, Kelly Chilson, Shaina R. Eckhouse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Although the number of women medical trainees has increased in recent years, they remain a minority of the academic workforce. Gender-based implicit biases may lead to deleterious effects on surgical workforce retention and productivity. Methods: All 440 attending surgeons and anesthesiologists employed at our institution were invited to complete a survey regarding perceptions of the perioperative work environment and resources. Odds ratios for dichotomous variables were calculated using logistic regressions, and for trichotomous variables, polytomous regressions. Results: 243 participants (55.2%) provided complete survey responses. Relative to men, women faculty reported a greater need to prove themselves to staff; less respect and fewer resources and opportunities; more frequent assumptions about their capabilities; and a greater need to adjust their demeanor to connect with their team (p ​< ​0.05). Conclusion: Perceived gender bias remains present in the perioperative environment. We need greater efforts to address barriers and create an equitable work environment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)63-71
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican journal of surgery
Volume227
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2024

Keywords

  • Gender
  • Implicit bias
  • Microaggressions
  • Operating room environment
  • Perioperative
  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does gender affect experiences in the operating room for surgeons and anesthesiologists at a large academic center?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this