TY - JOUR
T1 - Does Anterior Plating of Pelvic Ring Fractures Increase Infection Risk in Patients With Bladder or Urethral Injuries?
AU - the EMIT Pelvic Fracture Study Group
AU - Medda, Suman
AU - Cuadra, Mario
AU - Yu, Ziqing
AU - Manzano, Givenchy
AU - Spitler, Clay
AU - Matuszewski, Paul
AU - Patch, David
AU - Pease, Tyler
AU - Chen, Andrew
AU - Garrard, Victoria
AU - Karunakar, Madhav
AU - Andring, Nicholas
AU - Averkamp, Benjamin
AU - Babcock, Sharon
AU - Bell, Kayla
AU - Bowers, Lucy
AU - Carroll, Eben
AU - Churchill, Christine
AU - Colcord, Madison
AU - Curtin, Patrick
AU - Grochowski, Erica
AU - Halvorson, Jason
AU - Hickson, Kate
AU - Hong, Zachery
AU - Kempton, Laurence
AU - Lance, Thea
AU - Marenghi, Natalie
AU - Mayberry, Robert Miles
AU - Miller, Anna
AU - Nash, Alysa
AU - Owens, Virgenal
AU - Parham, Jeremiah
AU - Phelps, Kevin
AU - Pilson, Holly
AU - Pollock, Hannah
AU - Rieker, Madeline
AU - Roomian, Tamar
AU - Ross, Owen
AU - Seymour, Rachel
AU - Sims, Stephen
AU - Sweeney, Juliette
AU - Yin, Timothy C.
AU - Young, Catherine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/3/1
Y1 - 2024/3/1
N2 - OBJECTIVES:Evaluate the effect of anterior fixation on infection in patients with operative pelvic fractures and bladder or urethral injuries.METHODS:Design:Retrospective.Setting:Eight centers.Patient Selection Criteria:Adult patients with closed pelvic fractures with associated bladder or urethral injuries treated with anterior plating (AP), intramedullary screw (IS), or no anterior internal fixation (NAIF, including external fixation or no fixation).Outcome Measures and Comparisons:Deep infection.RESULTS:There were 81 extraperitoneal injuries and 57 urethral injuries. There was no difference in infection between fixation groups across all urologic injuries (AP: 10.8%, IS: 0%, NAIF: 4.9%, P = 0.41). There was a higher rate of infection in the urethral injury group compared with extraperitoneal injuries (14.0% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.016). Among extraperitoneal injuries, specifically, there was no difference in deep infection related to fixation (AP: 2.6%, IS 0%, NAIF: 2.9%, P = 0.99). Among urethral injuries, there was no statistical difference in deep infection related to fixation (AP: 23.1%, IS: 0%, NAIF: 7.4%, P = 0.21). There was a higher rate of suprapubic catheter (SPC) use in urethral injuries compared with extraperitoneal injuries (57.9% vs. 4.9%, P < 0.0001). In the urethral injury group, SPC use did not have a statistically significant difference in infection rate (SPC: 18.2% vs. No SPC: 8.3%, P = 0.45). Early removal of the SPC before or during the definitive orthopaedic intervention did not significantly affect infection rate (early: 0% vs. delayed: 25.0%, P = 0.16).CONCLUSIONS:Surgeons should approach operative pelvic fractures with associated urologic injuries with caution given the high risk of infection. Further work must be done to elucidate the effect of anterior implants and SPC use and duration.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
AB - OBJECTIVES:Evaluate the effect of anterior fixation on infection in patients with operative pelvic fractures and bladder or urethral injuries.METHODS:Design:Retrospective.Setting:Eight centers.Patient Selection Criteria:Adult patients with closed pelvic fractures with associated bladder or urethral injuries treated with anterior plating (AP), intramedullary screw (IS), or no anterior internal fixation (NAIF, including external fixation or no fixation).Outcome Measures and Comparisons:Deep infection.RESULTS:There were 81 extraperitoneal injuries and 57 urethral injuries. There was no difference in infection between fixation groups across all urologic injuries (AP: 10.8%, IS: 0%, NAIF: 4.9%, P = 0.41). There was a higher rate of infection in the urethral injury group compared with extraperitoneal injuries (14.0% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.016). Among extraperitoneal injuries, specifically, there was no difference in deep infection related to fixation (AP: 2.6%, IS 0%, NAIF: 2.9%, P = 0.99). Among urethral injuries, there was no statistical difference in deep infection related to fixation (AP: 23.1%, IS: 0%, NAIF: 7.4%, P = 0.21). There was a higher rate of suprapubic catheter (SPC) use in urethral injuries compared with extraperitoneal injuries (57.9% vs. 4.9%, P < 0.0001). In the urethral injury group, SPC use did not have a statistically significant difference in infection rate (SPC: 18.2% vs. No SPC: 8.3%, P = 0.45). Early removal of the SPC before or during the definitive orthopaedic intervention did not significantly affect infection rate (early: 0% vs. delayed: 25.0%, P = 0.16).CONCLUSIONS:Surgeons should approach operative pelvic fractures with associated urologic injuries with caution given the high risk of infection. Further work must be done to elucidate the effect of anterior implants and SPC use and duration.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
KW - anterior pelvis plate fixation
KW - bladder injury
KW - pelvic fracture
KW - urethral injury
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85185712376&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002745
DO - 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002745
M3 - Article
C2 - 38117571
AN - SCOPUS:85185712376
SN - 0890-5339
VL - 38
SP - 129
EP - 133
JO - Journal of orthopaedic trauma
JF - Journal of orthopaedic trauma
IS - 3
ER -