Do the Effects of Unpopular Supreme Court Rulings Linger? the Dobbs Decision Rescinding Abortion Rights

  • James L. Gibson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    New evidence suggests that the world recently changed for the U.S. Supreme Court owing to its decision to abrogate the abortion rights first announced in Roe v. Wade. In contrast to the conventional wisdom that Court support is little undermined by unpopular rulings, the Dobbs decision generated a substantial knock on the Court's legitimacy. Two crucial frailties limit these findings, however. First, no one has determined whether the lost legitimacy has persisted, since earlier research relied on a one-shot survey conducted shortly after the decision. Second, no analysis has addressed the values-based regeneration hypothesis - that support reemerges not long after a legitimacy hit is inflicted. Based on a nationally representative 2023 survey, my analysis finds that the lost legitimacy has lingered, but institutional support may be being rebuilt owing to its close connection with democratic values. Overall, I conclude that understanding persistence is more complicated than many may have assumed.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)500-507
    Number of pages8
    JournalAmerican Political Science Review
    Volume119
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Feb 1 2025

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Do the Effects of Unpopular Supreme Court Rulings Linger? the Dobbs Decision Rescinding Abortion Rights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this