TY - GEN
T1 - Do People Think Fast or Slow When Training AI?
AU - S.treiman, Lauren
AU - Ho, Chien Ju
AU - Kool, Wouter
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Copyright held by the owner/author(s).
PY - 2025/6/23
Y1 - 2025/6/23
N2 - Artificial intelligence (AI) plays a crucial role in decision making. In doing so, it often learns to make choices from human behavior, assuming that people provide unbiased training data. However, studies show that people change their behavior when they are aware they are training AI. It remains unknown whether these modifications are intuitive, driven by social norms, or deliberate, aimed at maximizing personal gain. Across three experiments, we investigated the extent people deliberate when training AI using the ultimatum game. In this game, participants decided whether to accept monetary rewards. Some participants were informed they would train an AI to respond to their or other participants' proposals made in a follow-up session, while others were not. Those training AI could intuitively reject unfair offers or deliberately accept them to maximize current and future rewards. We found that participants rejected unfair offers, suggesting they were more inclined to rely on intuition when training AI. This reveals that people often embed their biases into AI, posing a challenge for AI designed to make optimal decisions.
AB - Artificial intelligence (AI) plays a crucial role in decision making. In doing so, it often learns to make choices from human behavior, assuming that people provide unbiased training data. However, studies show that people change their behavior when they are aware they are training AI. It remains unknown whether these modifications are intuitive, driven by social norms, or deliberate, aimed at maximizing personal gain. Across three experiments, we investigated the extent people deliberate when training AI using the ultimatum game. In this game, participants decided whether to accept monetary rewards. Some participants were informed they would train an AI to respond to their or other participants' proposals made in a follow-up session, while others were not. Those training AI could intuitively reject unfair offers or deliberately accept them to maximize current and future rewards. We found that participants rejected unfair offers, suggesting they were more inclined to rely on intuition when training AI. This reveals that people often embed their biases into AI, posing a challenge for AI designed to make optimal decisions.
KW - AI training
KW - cognitive processing
KW - decision making
KW - ultimatum game
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105010823873
U2 - 10.1145/3715275.3732177
DO - 10.1145/3715275.3732177
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105010823873
T3 - ACMF AccT 2025 - Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability,and Transparency
SP - 2728
EP - 2750
BT - ACMF AccT 2025 - Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability,and Transparency
PB - Association for Computing Machinery, Inc
T2 - 8th Annual ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT 2025
Y2 - 23 June 2025 through 26 June 2025
ER -