purpose: To evaluate the nature of the decision to write a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order in the Emergency Department (ED). patients and methods: This is a prospective evaluation of 37 consecutive patients for whom a DNR order was written by personnel assigned to the ED of a large inner-city teaching hospital. For each patient, information was collected including who was involved in the decision, the difficulty the family or patient had in agreeing to the DNR order, acute and chronic problems, how often the patient could enter into the process, and the ultimate outcome. results: DNR orders were usually initiated by house officers assigned to the ED (65%), and the family was usually involved (89%, mean of 1.4 family members per patient). There were no cases where significant resistance to the DNR order was exhibited by the family. The patients were generally elderly, demented, and debilitated with multiple chronic medical problems or young with malignancy or the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and had become critically ill and unstable. Only five patients were able to enter into the decision. Discussion of DNR status had occurred previously in only 14% of patients. conclusion: Because there remains considerable reluctance on the part of physicians to discuss the DNR issue before patients become critically ill, it is often necessary for ED physicians to write a DNR order. Although the ED is not an ideal setting for discussion of DNR orders and patients and families do not generally initiate this discussion, DNR orders can be written by ED physicians after consultation with the family.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)129-133
Number of pages5
JournalThe American journal of medicine
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 1992


Dive into the research topics of 'Do-not-resuscitate orders in the emergency department'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this