TY - JOUR
T1 - Distinguishing between moving and stationary sources using EEG/MEG measurements with an application to epilepsy
AU - Yetik, Imam Şamil
AU - Nehorai, Arye
AU - Lewine, Jeffrey David
AU - Muravchik, Carlos H.
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received August 30, 2003; revised August 23, 2004. This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant CCR-0105334. Asterisk indicates corresponding author. *İ. S¸. Yetik is with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE), University of Illinois at Chicago, 851 S. Morgan, Room 1020 SEO, Chicago, IL 60607 USA (e-mail: [email protected]). A. Nehorai is with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607 USA. J. D. Lewine is with the University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160 USA. C. H. Muravchik is with the Universidad Nacional de La Plata, 1900 La Plata, Argentina. Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TBME.2004.843289
PY - 2005/3
Y1 - 2005/3
N2 - Performances of electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) source estimation methods depend on the validity of the assumed model. In many cases, the model structure is related to physical information. We discuss a number of statistical selection methods to distinguish between two possible models using least-squares estimation and assuming a spherical head model. The first model has a single moving source whereas the second has two stationary sources; these may result in similar EEG/MEG measurements. The need to decide between such models occurs for example in Jacksonian seizures (e.g., epilepsy) or in intralobular activities, where a model with either two stationary dipole sources or a single moving dipole source may be possible. We also show that all of the selection methods discussed choose the correct model with probability one when the number of trials goes to infinity. Finally we present numerical examples and compare the performances of the methods by varying parameters such as the signal-to-noise ratio, source depth, and separation of sources, and also apply the methods to real MEG data for epilepsy.
AB - Performances of electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) source estimation methods depend on the validity of the assumed model. In many cases, the model structure is related to physical information. We discuss a number of statistical selection methods to distinguish between two possible models using least-squares estimation and assuming a spherical head model. The first model has a single moving source whereas the second has two stationary sources; these may result in similar EEG/MEG measurements. The need to decide between such models occurs for example in Jacksonian seizures (e.g., epilepsy) or in intralobular activities, where a model with either two stationary dipole sources or a single moving dipole source may be possible. We also show that all of the selection methods discussed choose the correct model with probability one when the number of trials goes to infinity. Finally we present numerical examples and compare the performances of the methods by varying parameters such as the signal-to-noise ratio, source depth, and separation of sources, and also apply the methods to real MEG data for epilepsy.
KW - Electroencephalography
KW - Epilepsy
KW - Magnetoencephalography
KW - Model selection
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/14844315793
U2 - 10.1109/TBME.2004.843289
DO - 10.1109/TBME.2004.843289
M3 - Article
C2 - 15759577
AN - SCOPUS:14844315793
SN - 0018-9294
VL - 52
SP - 471
EP - 479
JO - IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
JF - IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
IS - 3
ER -