TY - JOUR
T1 - Distal pancreatectomy in cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy
T2 - Identifying risk and improving patient selection
AU - Sullivan, Brianne J.
AU - Leigh, Natasha L.
AU - Bekhor, Eliahu Y.
AU - Carpiniello, Matthew
AU - Solomon, Daniel
AU - Magge, Deepa R.
AU - Sarpel, Umut
AU - Golas, Benjamin J.
AU - Labow, Daniel M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - Background: Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) has become a principal tool in the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), but inclusion of pancreatic resection to obtain optimal debulking remains controversial. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 419 patients with PC who underwent CRS/HIPEC. The patients were divided into two cohorts, those with distal pancreatectomy (DP) and those without (NP), and morbidity and survival outcomes were compared. Results: The DP cohort (n = 37) and the NP cohort (n = 371) had similar clinicopathologic characteristics (age, p = 0.596; gender, p = 0.328; ASA, p = 0.072). Operative time, number of organs resected, and EBL were greater in the DP cohort (<0.0001). A complete cytoreduction was achieved in 90% of the NP cohort versus 69% of the DP cohort (p = 0.0004). Major perioperative morbidity was more common in those with pancreatic resection (41% vs 19%, p = 0.002). However, there was no significant difference in 90-day mortality or overall survival. Conclusion: Achieving complete cytoreduction is critical to improving long term outcomes for patients with PC. Although pancreatic resections are associated with higher morbidity, short-term survival is not impacted adversely. Pancreatic involvement should not be a strict exclusion criterion for CRS/HIPEC, but patients need to be selected carefully, with close attention to disease burden prior to proceeding.
AB - Background: Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) has become a principal tool in the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), but inclusion of pancreatic resection to obtain optimal debulking remains controversial. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 419 patients with PC who underwent CRS/HIPEC. The patients were divided into two cohorts, those with distal pancreatectomy (DP) and those without (NP), and morbidity and survival outcomes were compared. Results: The DP cohort (n = 37) and the NP cohort (n = 371) had similar clinicopathologic characteristics (age, p = 0.596; gender, p = 0.328; ASA, p = 0.072). Operative time, number of organs resected, and EBL were greater in the DP cohort (<0.0001). A complete cytoreduction was achieved in 90% of the NP cohort versus 69% of the DP cohort (p = 0.0004). Major perioperative morbidity was more common in those with pancreatic resection (41% vs 19%, p = 0.002). However, there was no significant difference in 90-day mortality or overall survival. Conclusion: Achieving complete cytoreduction is critical to improving long term outcomes for patients with PC. Although pancreatic resections are associated with higher morbidity, short-term survival is not impacted adversely. Pancreatic involvement should not be a strict exclusion criterion for CRS/HIPEC, but patients need to be selected carefully, with close attention to disease burden prior to proceeding.
KW - Cytoreductive surgery
KW - Distal pancreatectomy
KW - Peritoneal carcinomatosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087727484&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.06.045
DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.06.045
M3 - Article
C2 - 32654767
AN - SCOPUS:85087727484
SN - 0002-9610
VL - 220
SP - 1235
EP - 1241
JO - American journal of surgery
JF - American journal of surgery
IS - 5
ER -