TY - JOUR
T1 - Dissociative effects of orthographic distinctiveness in pure and mixed lists
T2 - An item-order account
AU - McDaniel, Mark A.
AU - Cahill, Michael
AU - Bugg, Julie M.
AU - Meadow, Nathaniel G.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - We apply the item-order theory of list composition effects in free recall to the orthographic distinctiveness effect. The item-order account assumes that orthographically distinct items advantage item-specific encoding in both mixed and pure lists, but at the expense of exploiting relational information present in the list. Experiment 1 replicated the typical free recall advantage of orthographically distinct items in mixed lists and the elimination of that advantage in pure lists. Supporting the item-order account, recognition performances indicated that orthographically distinct items received greater item-specific encoding than did orthographically common items in mixed and pure lists (Experiments 1 and 2). Furthermore, order memory (input-output correspondence and sequential contiguity effects) was evident in recall of pure unstructured common lists, but not in recall of unstructured distinct lists (Experiment 1). These combined patterns, although not anticipated by prevailing views, are consistent with an item-order account.
AB - We apply the item-order theory of list composition effects in free recall to the orthographic distinctiveness effect. The item-order account assumes that orthographically distinct items advantage item-specific encoding in both mixed and pure lists, but at the expense of exploiting relational information present in the list. Experiment 1 replicated the typical free recall advantage of orthographically distinct items in mixed lists and the elimination of that advantage in pure lists. Supporting the item-order account, recognition performances indicated that orthographically distinct items received greater item-specific encoding than did orthographically common items in mixed and pure lists (Experiments 1 and 2). Furthermore, order memory (input-output correspondence and sequential contiguity effects) was evident in recall of pure unstructured common lists, but not in recall of unstructured distinct lists (Experiment 1). These combined patterns, although not anticipated by prevailing views, are consistent with an item-order account.
KW - Item-order account
KW - Memory
KW - Mixed vs. pure lists
KW - Orthographic distinctiveness
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84856442299
U2 - 10.3758/s13421-011-0097-9
DO - 10.3758/s13421-011-0097-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 21584853
AN - SCOPUS:84856442299
SN - 0090-502X
VL - 39
SP - 1162
EP - 1173
JO - Memory and Cognition
JF - Memory and Cognition
IS - 7
ER -