TY - JOUR
T1 - Disparities in treatment patterns and outcomes among younger and older adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
T2 - A population-based study
AU - Mian, Hira S.
AU - Seow, Hsien
AU - Wildes, Tanya M.
AU - Kouroukis, C. Tom
AU - Pond, Gregory R.
AU - Sivapathasundaram, Branavan
AU - Sussman, Jonathan
N1 - Funding Information:
Juravinski Cancer Center Foundation Grant.This work was supported by a grant from the Juravinski Cancer Centre Foundation. This study was supported by ICES, which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC). The opinions, results and conclusions reported in this article are those of the authors and are independent from the funding sources. No endorsement by ICES or the Ontario MOHLTC is intended or should be inferred. Parts of this material are based on data and/or information compiled and provided by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). However, the analyses, conclusions, opinions and statements expressed in the material are those of the authors, and not necessarily those of CIHI. We acknowledge Cancer Care Ontario for access to the Ontario Cancer Registry (OCR), Cancer Activity Level Reporting (ALR), Symptom Management Database (ESAS) and The New Drug Funding Program (NDFP). We thank IQVIA Solutions Canada Inc. for use of their Drug Information Database. We would also like to acknowledge Mr. Richard Perez for his contribution.
Funding Information:
Juravinski Cancer Center Foundation Grant.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - Introduction: Multiple myeloma, a cancer of older adults, has seen significant improvement in therapeutic options over the past two decades. Uncovering disparities in treatment patterns and outcomes is imperative in order to ensure older adults, who are underrepresented in clinical trials, are benefitting from these advances. Methods: Adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) were identified using linked provincial administrative databases between 2007 and 2017 in Ontario, Canada. Trends in rate of no treatment, novel drug and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) usage was evaluated within one year following diagnosis along with the associated early mortality (<12 months) for the aforementioned cohorts among younger (≤65 years) and older adults (>65 years) with NDMM. Results: A total of 8841 adults with NDMM were identified. Rates of no treatment decreased in both age groups during the study period; however still remain considerably high among older patients (from 34.9% in 2007 to 27.4% in 2017) with high associated early mortality in the older untreated group (54.1% 1 yr mortality over study period). Despite increased usage of novel drugs in both age groups, early mortality decreased among younger patients utilizing novel drugs (16.1% to 5.6%) but remained high and stagnant in older patients using novel drugs (18.2% 1 yr mortality over study period). ASCT utilization increased in both age groups during the study period with decreasing early mortality among older patients undergoing ASCT (from 26.3% in 2007 to 1.1% in 2017). Conclusion: While several improvements have been made, rates of no treatment and early mortality among patients not treated and those started on novel drugs remains a concern in older adults with NDMM.
AB - Introduction: Multiple myeloma, a cancer of older adults, has seen significant improvement in therapeutic options over the past two decades. Uncovering disparities in treatment patterns and outcomes is imperative in order to ensure older adults, who are underrepresented in clinical trials, are benefitting from these advances. Methods: Adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) were identified using linked provincial administrative databases between 2007 and 2017 in Ontario, Canada. Trends in rate of no treatment, novel drug and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) usage was evaluated within one year following diagnosis along with the associated early mortality (<12 months) for the aforementioned cohorts among younger (≤65 years) and older adults (>65 years) with NDMM. Results: A total of 8841 adults with NDMM were identified. Rates of no treatment decreased in both age groups during the study period; however still remain considerably high among older patients (from 34.9% in 2007 to 27.4% in 2017) with high associated early mortality in the older untreated group (54.1% 1 yr mortality over study period). Despite increased usage of novel drugs in both age groups, early mortality decreased among younger patients utilizing novel drugs (16.1% to 5.6%) but remained high and stagnant in older patients using novel drugs (18.2% 1 yr mortality over study period). ASCT utilization increased in both age groups during the study period with decreasing early mortality among older patients undergoing ASCT (from 26.3% in 2007 to 1.1% in 2017). Conclusion: While several improvements have been made, rates of no treatment and early mortality among patients not treated and those started on novel drugs remains a concern in older adults with NDMM.
KW - Aged
KW - Health services
KW - Multiple myeloma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85093972333&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.10.009
DO - 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.10.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 33109484
AN - SCOPUS:85093972333
SN - 1879-4068
VL - 12
SP - 508
EP - 514
JO - Journal of Geriatric Oncology
JF - Journal of Geriatric Oncology
IS - 4
ER -