TY - JOUR
T1 - Disparities in ovarian cancer survival at the only NCI-designated cancer center in Kansas
AU - Petersen, Shariska
AU - Shahiri, Parmida
AU - Jewell, Andrea
AU - Spoozak, Lori
AU - Chapman, Julia
AU - Fitzgerald-Wolff, Sharon
AU - Lai, Sue Min
AU - Khabele, Dineo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Background: This study examined the impact of geographic distance on survival outcomes for patients receiving treatment for ovarian cancer at the only NCI-designated cancer center (NCI-CC) in Kansas. Methods: We identified ovarian cancer patients treated at the University of Kansas Cancer Center between 2010 and 2015. Demographic factors and clinical characteristics were abstracted. The main outcome measure was overall survival according to geographic distance from the institution. Kaplan Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazard models were generated using SAS v9.4. Results: 220 patients were identified. Survival analysis based on distance from the institution demonstrated that patients who lived ≤10 miles from the institution had worse overall survival (p = 0.0207) and were more likely to have suboptimal cytoreductive surgery (p = 0.0276). Lower estimated median income was also associated with a 1.54 increased risk of death, 95% CI (1.031–2.292), p = 0.0347. Conclusions: We determined that ovarian cancer survival disparities exist in our patient population. Lower rates of optimal cytoreductive surgery has been identified as a possible driver of poor prognosis for patients who lived in proximity to our institution.
AB - Background: This study examined the impact of geographic distance on survival outcomes for patients receiving treatment for ovarian cancer at the only NCI-designated cancer center (NCI-CC) in Kansas. Methods: We identified ovarian cancer patients treated at the University of Kansas Cancer Center between 2010 and 2015. Demographic factors and clinical characteristics were abstracted. The main outcome measure was overall survival according to geographic distance from the institution. Kaplan Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazard models were generated using SAS v9.4. Results: 220 patients were identified. Survival analysis based on distance from the institution demonstrated that patients who lived ≤10 miles from the institution had worse overall survival (p = 0.0207) and were more likely to have suboptimal cytoreductive surgery (p = 0.0276). Lower estimated median income was also associated with a 1.54 increased risk of death, 95% CI (1.031–2.292), p = 0.0347. Conclusions: We determined that ovarian cancer survival disparities exist in our patient population. Lower rates of optimal cytoreductive surgery has been identified as a possible driver of poor prognosis for patients who lived in proximity to our institution.
KW - Geographic disparities
KW - Ovarian cancer disparities
KW - Suboptimal debulking
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097733470&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.12.009
DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.12.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 33309256
AN - SCOPUS:85097733470
SN - 0002-9610
VL - 221
SP - 712
EP - 717
JO - American journal of surgery
JF - American journal of surgery
IS - 4
ER -