Discussion: 'Cervical dilation in mid-pregnancy: expectant management versus cerclage' by Pereira et al

Alison G. Cahill, Anthony Odibo, Denise M. Willers, Jen Jen Chang, Anthony Shanks, Kathrine Goetzinger

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

In the roundtable that follows, clinicians discuss a study published in this issue of the Journal in light of its methodology, relevance to practice, and implications for future research. Article discussed:. Pereira L, Cotter A, Gómez R, et al. Expectant management compared to physical exam-indicated cerclage in selected women with a dilated cervix between 140/7 and 256/7 weeks: Results from the EM-PEC international cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:483.e1-483.e8.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e1-e5
JournalAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology
Volume197
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2007

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Discussion: 'Cervical dilation in mid-pregnancy: expectant management versus cerclage' by Pereira et al'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this