TY - JOUR
T1 - Discussion
T2 - 'Cervical dilation in mid-pregnancy: expectant management versus cerclage' by Pereira et al
AU - Cahill, Alison G.
AU - Odibo, Anthony
AU - Willers, Denise M.
AU - Chang, Jen Jen
AU - Shanks, Anthony
AU - Goetzinger, Kathrine
PY - 2007/11
Y1 - 2007/11
N2 - In the roundtable that follows, clinicians discuss a study published in this issue of the Journal in light of its methodology, relevance to practice, and implications for future research. Article discussed:. Pereira L, Cotter A, Gómez R, et al. Expectant management compared to physical exam-indicated cerclage in selected women with a dilated cervix between 140/7 and 256/7 weeks: Results from the EM-PEC international cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:483.e1-483.e8.
AB - In the roundtable that follows, clinicians discuss a study published in this issue of the Journal in light of its methodology, relevance to practice, and implications for future research. Article discussed:. Pereira L, Cotter A, Gómez R, et al. Expectant management compared to physical exam-indicated cerclage in selected women with a dilated cervix between 140/7 and 256/7 weeks: Results from the EM-PEC international cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:483.e1-483.e8.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35548999614&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.10.496
DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.10.496
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:35548999614
SN - 0002-9378
VL - 197
SP - e1-e5
JO - American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
JF - American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
IS - 5
ER -