TY - JOUR
T1 - Differential Responses to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors are Governed by Diverse Mismatch Repair Gene Alterations
AU - Khushman, Moh'd M.
AU - Toboni, Michael D.
AU - Xiu, Joanne
AU - Manne, Upender
AU - Farrell, Alex
AU - Lou, Emil
AU - Shields, Anthony F.
AU - Philip, Philip A.
AU - Salem, Mohamed E.
AU - Abraham, Jim
AU - Spetzler, David
AU - Marshall, John
AU - Jayachandran, Priya
AU - Hall, Michael J.
AU - Lenz, Heinz Josef
AU - Sahin, Ibrahim Halil
AU - Seeber, Andreas
AU - Powell, Mathew A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Association for Cancer Research.
PY - 2024/5/1
Y1 - 2024/5/1
N2 - Purpose: The response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer is variable. Here, we explored the differential response to ICIs according to different mismatch repair alterations Experimental Design: Colorectal cancer (N = 13,701) and endometrial cancer (N = 3,315) specimens were tested at Caris Life Sciences. Median overall survival (mOS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier. The prediction of high-, intermediate-, and lowaffinity epitopes by tumor mutation burden (TMB) values was conducted using R-squared (R2). Results: Compared with mutL (MLH1 and PMS2) co-loss, the mOSwas longer in mutS (MSH2 and MSH6) co-loss in all colorectal cancer (54.6 vs. 36 months; P = 0.0.025) and endometrial cancer (81.5 vs. 48.2 months; P < 0.001) patients. In ICI-treated patients, the mOS was longer in mutS co-loss in colorectal cancer [not reached (NR) vs. 36 months; P = 0.011). In endometrial cancer, the mOS was NR vs. 42.2 months; P = 0.711]. The neoantigen load (NAL) in mutS co-loss compared with mutL co-loss was higher in colorectal cancer (high-affinity epitopes: 25.5 vs. 19; q = 0.017, intermediate: 39 vs. 32; q = 0.004, low: 87.5 vs. 73; q < 0.001) and endometrial cancer (high-affinity epitopes: 15 vs. 11; q = 0.002, intermediate: 27.5 vs. 19; q < 0.001, low: 59 vs. 41; q < 0.001), respectively. R2 ranged from 0.25 in mutS co-loss colorectal cancer to 0.95 in mutL co-loss endometrial cancer. Conclusions: Patients with mutS co-loss experienced longer mOS in colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer and better response to ICIs in colorectal cancer. Among all explored biomarkers, NAL was higher in mutS co-loss and may be a potential driving factor for the observed better outcomes. TMB did not reliably predict NAL.
AB - Purpose: The response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer is variable. Here, we explored the differential response to ICIs according to different mismatch repair alterations Experimental Design: Colorectal cancer (N = 13,701) and endometrial cancer (N = 3,315) specimens were tested at Caris Life Sciences. Median overall survival (mOS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier. The prediction of high-, intermediate-, and lowaffinity epitopes by tumor mutation burden (TMB) values was conducted using R-squared (R2). Results: Compared with mutL (MLH1 and PMS2) co-loss, the mOSwas longer in mutS (MSH2 and MSH6) co-loss in all colorectal cancer (54.6 vs. 36 months; P = 0.0.025) and endometrial cancer (81.5 vs. 48.2 months; P < 0.001) patients. In ICI-treated patients, the mOS was longer in mutS co-loss in colorectal cancer [not reached (NR) vs. 36 months; P = 0.011). In endometrial cancer, the mOS was NR vs. 42.2 months; P = 0.711]. The neoantigen load (NAL) in mutS co-loss compared with mutL co-loss was higher in colorectal cancer (high-affinity epitopes: 25.5 vs. 19; q = 0.017, intermediate: 39 vs. 32; q = 0.004, low: 87.5 vs. 73; q < 0.001) and endometrial cancer (high-affinity epitopes: 15 vs. 11; q = 0.002, intermediate: 27.5 vs. 19; q < 0.001, low: 59 vs. 41; q < 0.001), respectively. R2 ranged from 0.25 in mutS co-loss colorectal cancer to 0.95 in mutL co-loss endometrial cancer. Conclusions: Patients with mutS co-loss experienced longer mOS in colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer and better response to ICIs in colorectal cancer. Among all explored biomarkers, NAL was higher in mutS co-loss and may be a potential driving factor for the observed better outcomes. TMB did not reliably predict NAL.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190798416&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-3004
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-3004
M3 - Article
C2 - 38350001
AN - SCOPUS:85190798416
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 30
SP - 1906
EP - 1915
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 9
ER -