Dialogue as Renounced Aggression: JMI and the Case of AOM’s President’s Response to EO13769

  • Richard W. Stackman
  • , Pablo Martin de Holan
  • , Nicholas Argyres
  • , Sandro Cabral
  • , Thomas P. Moliterno
  • , James Stoner
  • , James P. Walsh

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Dialogue and debate are at the core of the social sciences. In this piece, the Journal of Management Inquiry (JMI) editors-in-chief discuss their position and decisions pertaining to the publication of Professor Anita McGahan’s response to Professor Hardimos Tsoukas. A key decision—given JMI’s commitment to dialogue and exchange in its scholarly form—included publishing three curated pieces where renowned scholars applied their scholarly voice and expertise to McGahan’s historical narrative. To conclude this piece and the entire Editors’ Choice collection, five scholars speak to needed qualitative research standards or address McGahan’s leadership directly. Specific corrections to Tsoukas are also provided.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)268-275
    Number of pages8
    JournalJournal of Management Inquiry
    Volume28
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 1 2019

    Keywords

    • event history analysis
    • leadership
    • qualitative research

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Dialogue as Renounced Aggression: JMI and the Case of AOM’s President’s Response to EO13769'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this