Diagnostic yield of malignancy during EUS-guided FNA of solid lesions with and without a stylet: A prospective, single blind, randomized, controlled trial

  • Sachin Wani
  • , Dayna Early
  • , Julie Kunkel
  • , Ann Leathersich
  • , Christine E. Hovis
  • , Thomas G. Hollander
  • , Cara Kohlmeier
  • , Cynthia Zelenka
  • , Riad Azar
  • , Steven Edmundowicz
  • , Brian Collins
  • , Jingxia Liu
  • , Matthew Hall
  • , Daniel Mullady

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

83 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Use of a stylet during EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) is believed to improve the quality and diagnostic yield of specimens. Objective: To compare samples obtained by EUS-FNA with (S+) and without (S-) a stylet for diagnostic yield of malignancy and cytological characteristics. Design: Randomized, controlled trial. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Consecutive patients referred for EUS-FNA of solid lesions. Intervention: EUS-FNA; the number of passes was determined by lesion site (6 pancreas/others and 4 lymph nodes). Main Outcome Measurements: Diagnostic yield of malignancy and degree of cellularity, specimen adequacy, contamination, and amount of blood. Results: One hundred patients were prospectively enrolled in this randomized, controlled trial and the sites of EUS-FNA were the pancreas, 58; lymph node, 25; and other, 17. The overall diagnosis was malignancy in 56, benign in 30, suspicious/atypical in 7, and inadequate specimen in 7 lesions. There were 550 passes made (275 with a stylet and 275 without a stylet). Interim analysis demonstrated no difference in the diagnostic yield of malignancy (94 passes with a stylet [34.2%] vs 110 without a stylet [40%], P =.2) and in the proportion of inadequate specimens (57 with a stylet [20.7%] vs 64 without a stylet [23.3%], P =.2). There was no difference with regard to cellularity (P =.83), contamination (P =.31), number of cells (P =.25), and amount of blood (P =.6). Similar results were noted in a subgroup analysis based on lesion site. Applying the rules of futility, the study was terminated. Limitations: Subjectivity in cytopathologists' assessment, endosonographer not blinded. Conclusions: There was no difference in the diagnostic yield of malignancy or proportion of inadequate specimens between passes with and without a stylet. These results suggest that the use of a stylet does not confer any advantage during EUS-FNA. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01316614.)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)328-335
Number of pages8
JournalGastrointestinal endoscopy
Volume76
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnostic yield of malignancy during EUS-guided FNA of solid lesions with and without a stylet: A prospective, single blind, randomized, controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this