TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnosis of infected total knee
T2 - Findings of a multicenter database
AU - Parvizi, Javad
AU - Ghanem, Elie
AU - Sharkey, Peter
AU - Aggarwal, Ajay
AU - Burnett, R. Stephen J.
AU - Barrack, Robert L.
PY - 2008/11
Y1 - 2008/11
N2 - Although total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective and successful procedure, the outcome is occasionally compromised by complications including periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Accurate and early diagnosis is the first step in effectively managing patients with PJI. At the present time, diagnosis remains dependent on clinical judgment and reliance on standard clinical tests including serologic tests, analysis of aspirated joint fluid, and interpretation of intraoperative tissue and fluid test results. Although reports regarding sensitivity and specificity of all diagnostic tests in the literature are abundant, the interpretation of the available data has been hampered by the low sample size of these studies. In view of the scope of this important problem and the limitations of previous reports, a large database was assembled of all revision TKA performed at three academic referral centers in order to determine the current status of diagnosis of the infected TKA utilizing commonly available tests. Intraoperative cultures should not be used as a gold standard for PJI owing to high percentages of false-negative and false-positive cases. When combined with clinical judgment, total white cell count and percentage of neutrophils in the synovial fluid more accurately reflects PJI and when combined with hematologic exams safely excludes or confirms infection. Level of Evidence: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
AB - Although total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective and successful procedure, the outcome is occasionally compromised by complications including periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Accurate and early diagnosis is the first step in effectively managing patients with PJI. At the present time, diagnosis remains dependent on clinical judgment and reliance on standard clinical tests including serologic tests, analysis of aspirated joint fluid, and interpretation of intraoperative tissue and fluid test results. Although reports regarding sensitivity and specificity of all diagnostic tests in the literature are abundant, the interpretation of the available data has been hampered by the low sample size of these studies. In view of the scope of this important problem and the limitations of previous reports, a large database was assembled of all revision TKA performed at three academic referral centers in order to determine the current status of diagnosis of the infected TKA utilizing commonly available tests. Intraoperative cultures should not be used as a gold standard for PJI owing to high percentages of false-negative and false-positive cases. When combined with clinical judgment, total white cell count and percentage of neutrophils in the synovial fluid more accurately reflects PJI and when combined with hematologic exams safely excludes or confirms infection. Level of Evidence: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54449083601&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11999-008-0471-5
DO - 10.1007/s11999-008-0471-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 18781372
AN - SCOPUS:54449083601
SN - 0009-921X
VL - 466
SP - 2628
EP - 2633
JO - Clinical orthopaedics and related research
JF - Clinical orthopaedics and related research
IS - 11
ER -