Diagnosis of infected total knee: Findings of a multicenter database

Javad Parvizi, Elie Ghanem, Peter Sharkey, Ajay Aggarwal, R. Stephen J. Burnett, Robert L. Barrack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

125 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective and successful procedure, the outcome is occasionally compromised by complications including periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Accurate and early diagnosis is the first step in effectively managing patients with PJI. At the present time, diagnosis remains dependent on clinical judgment and reliance on standard clinical tests including serologic tests, analysis of aspirated joint fluid, and interpretation of intraoperative tissue and fluid test results. Although reports regarding sensitivity and specificity of all diagnostic tests in the literature are abundant, the interpretation of the available data has been hampered by the low sample size of these studies. In view of the scope of this important problem and the limitations of previous reports, a large database was assembled of all revision TKA performed at three academic referral centers in order to determine the current status of diagnosis of the infected TKA utilizing commonly available tests. Intraoperative cultures should not be used as a gold standard for PJI owing to high percentages of false-negative and false-positive cases. When combined with clinical judgment, total white cell count and percentage of neutrophils in the synovial fluid more accurately reflects PJI and when combined with hematologic exams safely excludes or confirms infection. Level of Evidence: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2628-2633
Number of pages6
JournalClinical orthopaedics and related research
Volume466
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2008

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnosis of infected total knee: Findings of a multicenter database'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this