TY - JOUR
T1 - Device therapy in patients with heart failure and advanced age
T2 - Too much too late?
AU - Cutro, Raymond
AU - Rich, Michael W.
AU - Hauptman, Paul J.
PY - 2012/2/23
Y1 - 2012/2/23
N2 - Expanding indications for implantable cardiac rhythmdevices coupledwith the aging of the population have led to a progressive rise in the number of elderly patients referred for device implantation. However, the value of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in elderly patients remains unproven, in part because few patients over 75 years of age were enrolled in the major device trials. In this article, we summarize the current evidence base regarding the use of device therapy in elderly heart failure patients.We review the efficacy, complications, indications, cost, and current controversies surrounding the use of ICDs and CRT in the geriatric age group. We conclude that reduced benefit coupled with higher complication rates and associated higher costs make it unlikely that the net clinical benefit of an ICD is favorable in most patients over 75 to 80 years of age. Conversely, preliminary data indicate that elderly patients undergoing CRT experience improved quality of life at acceptable cost, suggesting that CRTmay be an attractive therapeutic option in appropriately selected patients of advanced age.
AB - Expanding indications for implantable cardiac rhythmdevices coupledwith the aging of the population have led to a progressive rise in the number of elderly patients referred for device implantation. However, the value of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in elderly patients remains unproven, in part because few patients over 75 years of age were enrolled in the major device trials. In this article, we summarize the current evidence base regarding the use of device therapy in elderly heart failure patients.We review the efficacy, complications, indications, cost, and current controversies surrounding the use of ICDs and CRT in the geriatric age group. We conclude that reduced benefit coupled with higher complication rates and associated higher costs make it unlikely that the net clinical benefit of an ICD is favorable in most patients over 75 to 80 years of age. Conversely, preliminary data indicate that elderly patients undergoing CRT experience improved quality of life at acceptable cost, suggesting that CRTmay be an attractive therapeutic option in appropriately selected patients of advanced age.
KW - Cardiac resynchronization
KW - Defibrillator
KW - Elderly
KW - Heart failure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859905670&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.01.078
DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.01.078
M3 - Review article
C2 - 21342708
AN - SCOPUS:84859905670
SN - 0167-5273
VL - 155
SP - 52
EP - 55
JO - International Journal of Cardiology
JF - International Journal of Cardiology
IS - 1
ER -