TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a Patient Decision Aid for Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Aged ≥65 Years
AU - Graesser, Elizabeth A.
AU - Tian, Andrea C.
AU - Dardas, Agnes Z.
AU - Calfee, Ryan P.
AU - Wall, Lindley B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Society for Surgery of the Hand
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - Purpose: The ideal management of distal radius fractures (DRFs) in patients aged 65 years and older is debated. Acknowledging the evidence that both nonsurgical and surgical treatment yield similar outcomes one year after injury, a patient decision aid (PDA) could facilitate patient engagement in treatment decision-making. The purpose of this study was to develop a PDA to guide patients in the treatment of DRFs in patients ≥65 years of age. Methods: The DRF PDA was developed using an established decision sciences framework. The PDA included an overview of DRFs, treatment options (casting vs surgery), risk/benefits, and a values clarification section. During the development phase, hand surgeons and patients reviewed the PDA; then, semistructured interviews were performed with participants to elicit feedback. Results: Eleven patients and 11 hand surgeons participated in the study. All patients found the PDA useful and almost all stated it would make the treatment decision easier. Most patients believed that there was enough information in the PDA, but one desired more information about surgical risks. Almost all surgeons stated the PDA would be easy for patients to use and understand, and approximately half believed that it would help patients make a more informed decision. Most surgeons expressed that the PDA would complement their usual approach to counseling patients, but some noted it would involve changes to their workflow. Most participants believed the information presented was unbiased, but one patient thought it was biased toward surgery, whereas a few surgeons believed that it was biased toward nonsurgical treatment. Conclusions: All patients expressed that the PDA was informative, comprehensive, and easy to understand and would be helpful if they were deciding about DRF treatment. Surgeons believed that patients would find the PDA easy to use and understand, but some had concerns about incorporating it into their clinic workflow. Clinical relevance: A decision aid for the treatment of DRFs in patients aged ≥65 years can be used to engage patients in the shared decision-making process.
AB - Purpose: The ideal management of distal radius fractures (DRFs) in patients aged 65 years and older is debated. Acknowledging the evidence that both nonsurgical and surgical treatment yield similar outcomes one year after injury, a patient decision aid (PDA) could facilitate patient engagement in treatment decision-making. The purpose of this study was to develop a PDA to guide patients in the treatment of DRFs in patients ≥65 years of age. Methods: The DRF PDA was developed using an established decision sciences framework. The PDA included an overview of DRFs, treatment options (casting vs surgery), risk/benefits, and a values clarification section. During the development phase, hand surgeons and patients reviewed the PDA; then, semistructured interviews were performed with participants to elicit feedback. Results: Eleven patients and 11 hand surgeons participated in the study. All patients found the PDA useful and almost all stated it would make the treatment decision easier. Most patients believed that there was enough information in the PDA, but one desired more information about surgical risks. Almost all surgeons stated the PDA would be easy for patients to use and understand, and approximately half believed that it would help patients make a more informed decision. Most surgeons expressed that the PDA would complement their usual approach to counseling patients, but some noted it would involve changes to their workflow. Most participants believed the information presented was unbiased, but one patient thought it was biased toward surgery, whereas a few surgeons believed that it was biased toward nonsurgical treatment. Conclusions: All patients expressed that the PDA was informative, comprehensive, and easy to understand and would be helpful if they were deciding about DRF treatment. Surgeons believed that patients would find the PDA easy to use and understand, but some had concerns about incorporating it into their clinic workflow. Clinical relevance: A decision aid for the treatment of DRFs in patients aged ≥65 years can be used to engage patients in the shared decision-making process.
KW - Decision aid
KW - distal radius fracture
KW - elderly
KW - qualitative
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196957955&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.04.011
DO - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.04.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 38934995
AN - SCOPUS:85196957955
SN - 0363-5023
VL - 49
SP - 885
EP - 900
JO - Journal of Hand Surgery
JF - Journal of Hand Surgery
IS - 9
ER -