TY - JOUR
T1 - Development and Validation of WeCares, a Survey Instrument to Assess Hospitalized Patients’ and Family Members’ “Willingness to Engage in Your Care and Safety”
AU - Yen, Po Yin
AU - Lehmann, Lisa Soleymani
AU - Snyder, Julia
AU - Schnock, Kumiko
AU - Couture, Brittany
AU - Smith, Ann
AU - Pearl, Nicole
AU - Gershanik, Esteban
AU - Martinez, William
AU - Dykes, Patricia C.
AU - Bates, David W.
AU - Rossetti, Sarah Collins
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) 1P30HS0235335, Making Acute Care More Patient Centered.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Joint Commission
PY - 2020/10
Y1 - 2020/10
N2 - Background: Patient engagement is recognized as a method to improve care quality and safety. A research team developed WeCares (Willingness to Engage in Your Care and Safety), a survey instrument assessing patients’ and families’ engagement in the safety of their care during their hospital stay. The objective of this study is to establish the preliminary construct validity and internal consistency of WeCares. Methods: WeCares was distributed to patients and families. With the survey responses, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed to identify the factorial structure of WeCares. The internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Descriptive and comparative analysis was also performed to summarize patients’ and families’ responses. Results: A total of 247 patients and families responded to the WeCare survey, of which 224 were used for EFA. EFA resulted in a 13-item, four-factor structure, including (1) comfortable sharing concerns, (2) responsibility for preventing errors, (3) perception of care team members’ attitude, and (4) patients’/families’ role in preventing errors. The Cronbach alphas were 0.716–0.866, indicating acceptable internal consistency. Overall, patients and families were comfortable sharing concerns with clinicians but preferred to remain anonymous. They believed that the care team members hold most responsibility for error prevention, however, and agreed on their ability to help prevent errors. Conclusion: WeCares was developed to assess patients’ and families’ willingness to engage. WeCares can also be used to facilitate conversation about safety concerns and shared responsibility. The study team believes this would lead to patient activation in guarding their own care and ultimately improve patient outcomes and safety.
AB - Background: Patient engagement is recognized as a method to improve care quality and safety. A research team developed WeCares (Willingness to Engage in Your Care and Safety), a survey instrument assessing patients’ and families’ engagement in the safety of their care during their hospital stay. The objective of this study is to establish the preliminary construct validity and internal consistency of WeCares. Methods: WeCares was distributed to patients and families. With the survey responses, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed to identify the factorial structure of WeCares. The internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Descriptive and comparative analysis was also performed to summarize patients’ and families’ responses. Results: A total of 247 patients and families responded to the WeCare survey, of which 224 were used for EFA. EFA resulted in a 13-item, four-factor structure, including (1) comfortable sharing concerns, (2) responsibility for preventing errors, (3) perception of care team members’ attitude, and (4) patients’/families’ role in preventing errors. The Cronbach alphas were 0.716–0.866, indicating acceptable internal consistency. Overall, patients and families were comfortable sharing concerns with clinicians but preferred to remain anonymous. They believed that the care team members hold most responsibility for error prevention, however, and agreed on their ability to help prevent errors. Conclusion: WeCares was developed to assess patients’ and families’ willingness to engage. WeCares can also be used to facilitate conversation about safety concerns and shared responsibility. The study team believes this would lead to patient activation in guarding their own care and ultimately improve patient outcomes and safety.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090019116&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.07.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.07.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 32883579
AN - SCOPUS:85090019116
SN - 1553-7250
VL - 46
SP - 565
EP - 572
JO - Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
JF - Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
IS - 10
ER -