TY - JOUR
T1 - Development and validation of the Immune Profile Score (IPS), a novel multiomic algorithmic assay for stratifying outcomes in a real-world cohort of patients with advanced solid cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors
AU - Zander, Alia D.
AU - Erbe, Rossin
AU - Liu, Yan
AU - Jin, Ailin
AU - Hyun, Seung Won
AU - Mukhopadhyay, Sayantoni
AU - Terdich, Ben
AU - Rosasco, Mario G.
AU - Patel, Nirali
AU - Mahon, Brett M.
AU - Sasser, A. Kate
AU - Ting-Lin, Michelle A.
AU - Nimeiri, Halla
AU - Guinney, Justin
AU - Adkins, Douglas
AU - Zibelman, Matthew
AU - Beauchamp, Kyle A.
AU - Sangli, Chithra
AU - Stein, Michelle M.
AU - Taxter, Timothy
AU - Chan, Timothy
AU - Patel, Sandip P.
AU - Cohen, Ezra E.W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025.
PY - 2025/5/30
Y1 - 2025/5/30
N2 - Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the oncology treatment landscape. Despite substantial improvements for some patients, the majority do not benefit from ICIs, indicating a need for predictive biomarkers to better inform treatment decisions. Methods A de-identified pan-cancer cohort from the Tempus multimodal real-world database was used for the development and validation of the Immune Profile Score (IPS) algorithm leveraging Tempus xT (648 gene DNA panel) and xR (RNA sequencing) (N=1,707 development cohort; N=1,600 validation cohort). The cohort consisted of patients with advanced stage cancer with solid tumor carcinomas across 16 cancer types treated with any ICI-containing regimen as the first or second line of therapy. The IPS model was developed using a machine learning framework that includes tumor mutational burden (TMB) and 11 RNA-based biomarkers as features. Results IPS-High patients demonstrated significantly longer overall survival (OS) compared with IPS-Low patients (HR=0.45, 90% CI (0.40 to 0.52)). IPS was consistently prognostic in programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) (positive/negative), TMB (High/Low), microsatellite status (microsatellite instability (MSI)-High), and regimen (ICI only/ICI+other) subgroups. Additionally, IPS remained significant in multivariable models controlling for TMB, MSI, and PD-L1, with IPS HRs of 0.49 (90% CI 0.42 to 0.56), 0.47 (90% CI 0.41 to 0.53), and 0.45 (90% CI 0.38 to 0.53), respectively. In an exploratory predictive utility analysis of the subset of patients (n=345) receiving first-line chemotherapy (CT) and second-line ICI, there was no significant effect of IPS for time to next treatment on CT in L1 (HR=1.06 (90% CI 0.88 to 1.29)). However, there was a significant effect of IPS for OS on ICI in L2 (HR=0.63
AB - Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the oncology treatment landscape. Despite substantial improvements for some patients, the majority do not benefit from ICIs, indicating a need for predictive biomarkers to better inform treatment decisions. Methods A de-identified pan-cancer cohort from the Tempus multimodal real-world database was used for the development and validation of the Immune Profile Score (IPS) algorithm leveraging Tempus xT (648 gene DNA panel) and xR (RNA sequencing) (N=1,707 development cohort; N=1,600 validation cohort). The cohort consisted of patients with advanced stage cancer with solid tumor carcinomas across 16 cancer types treated with any ICI-containing regimen as the first or second line of therapy. The IPS model was developed using a machine learning framework that includes tumor mutational burden (TMB) and 11 RNA-based biomarkers as features. Results IPS-High patients demonstrated significantly longer overall survival (OS) compared with IPS-Low patients (HR=0.45, 90% CI (0.40 to 0.52)). IPS was consistently prognostic in programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) (positive/negative), TMB (High/Low), microsatellite status (microsatellite instability (MSI)-High), and regimen (ICI only/ICI+other) subgroups. Additionally, IPS remained significant in multivariable models controlling for TMB, MSI, and PD-L1, with IPS HRs of 0.49 (90% CI 0.42 to 0.56), 0.47 (90% CI 0.41 to 0.53), and 0.45 (90% CI 0.38 to 0.53), respectively. In an exploratory predictive utility analysis of the subset of patients (n=345) receiving first-line chemotherapy (CT) and second-line ICI, there was no significant effect of IPS for time to next treatment on CT in L1 (HR=1.06 (90% CI 0.88 to 1.29)). However, there was a significant effect of IPS for OS on ICI in L2 (HR=0.63
KW - Biomarker
KW - GEP
KW - Gene expression profiling
KW - Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor
KW - NGS
KW - Next generation sequencing
KW - TME
KW - Tumor microenvironment
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105007016323
U2 - 10.1136/jitc-2024-011363
DO - 10.1136/jitc-2024-011363
M3 - Article
C2 - 40447316
AN - SCOPUS:105007016323
SN - 2051-1426
VL - 13
JO - Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
JF - Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
IS - 5
M1 - e011363
ER -