Development and validation of the Immune Profile Score (IPS), a novel multiomic algorithmic assay for stratifying outcomes in a real-world cohort of patients with advanced solid cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

  • Alia D. Zander
  • , Rossin Erbe
  • , Yan Liu
  • , Ailin Jin
  • , Seung Won Hyun
  • , Sayantoni Mukhopadhyay
  • , Ben Terdich
  • , Mario G. Rosasco
  • , Nirali Patel
  • , Brett M. Mahon
  • , A. Kate Sasser
  • , Michelle A. Ting-Lin
  • , Halla Nimeiri
  • , Justin Guinney
  • , Douglas Adkins
  • , Matthew Zibelman
  • , Kyle A. Beauchamp
  • , Chithra Sangli
  • , Michelle M. Stein
  • , Timothy Taxter
  • Timothy Chan, Sandip P. Patel, Ezra E.W. Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the oncology treatment landscape. Despite substantial improvements for some patients, the majority do not benefit from ICIs, indicating a need for predictive biomarkers to better inform treatment decisions. Methods A de-identified pan-cancer cohort from the Tempus multimodal real-world database was used for the development and validation of the Immune Profile Score (IPS) algorithm leveraging Tempus xT (648 gene DNA panel) and xR (RNA sequencing) (N=1,707 development cohort; N=1,600 validation cohort). The cohort consisted of patients with advanced stage cancer with solid tumor carcinomas across 16 cancer types treated with any ICI-containing regimen as the first or second line of therapy. The IPS model was developed using a machine learning framework that includes tumor mutational burden (TMB) and 11 RNA-based biomarkers as features. Results IPS-High patients demonstrated significantly longer overall survival (OS) compared with IPS-Low patients (HR=0.45, 90% CI (0.40 to 0.52)). IPS was consistently prognostic in programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) (positive/negative), TMB (High/Low), microsatellite status (microsatellite instability (MSI)-High), and regimen (ICI only/ICI+other) subgroups. Additionally, IPS remained significant in multivariable models controlling for TMB, MSI, and PD-L1, with IPS HRs of 0.49 (90% CI 0.42 to 0.56), 0.47 (90% CI 0.41 to 0.53), and 0.45 (90% CI 0.38 to 0.53), respectively. In an exploratory predictive utility analysis of the subset of patients (n=345) receiving first-line chemotherapy (CT) and second-line ICI, there was no significant effect of IPS for time to next treatment on CT in L1 (HR=1.06 (90% CI 0.88 to 1.29)). However, there was a significant effect of IPS for OS on ICI in L2 (HR=0.63

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere011363
JournalJournal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
Volume13
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 30 2025

Keywords

  • Biomarker
  • GEP
  • Gene expression profiling
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor
  • NGS
  • Next generation sequencing
  • TME
  • Tumor microenvironment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development and validation of the Immune Profile Score (IPS), a novel multiomic algorithmic assay for stratifying outcomes in a real-world cohort of patients with advanced solid cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this