TY - JOUR
T1 - Development and Psychometric Testing of the Bimanual Assessment Measure for People With Chronic Stroke
AU - Johnson, Brian P.
AU - Whitall, Jill
AU - Waller, Sandy Mc Combe
AU - Westlake, Kelly P.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was partially funded by a Qualtrics Behavioral Research Award to Brian P. Johnson. We thank Nicole Shires and Cindy Uruburo for assisting in the early literature review and item selection and Gregory Hancock for methodological consultation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Authors. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Importance: Few tools are available to assess bimanual deficits after stroke. Objective: To develop the Bimanual Assessment Measure (BAM), which assesses a person’s hand coordination in both preferred and prestroke roles (i.e., stabilizer or manipulator). Design: Development and psychometric testing of the BAM. Setting: Research laboratory. Participants: People with chronic stroke (n 5 24), age-matched controls (n 5 23), and occupational therapists (n 5 40). Outcomes and Measures: We assessed the BAM’s internal consistency, reliability, and face and known-groups validity. Results: Items were selected as meaningful tasks that represented a range of bimanual coordination requirements (e.g., symmetrical forces and timing, asymmetrical forces and timing, time-limited reactive movement). Focus groups of people with stroke and occupational therapists provided input into BAM development. The BAM was found to have excellent reliability and internal consistency and face and known-groups validity. Conclusions and Relevance: The BAM is a valid, reliable measure for people with chronic stroke that identifies bimanual coordination deficits beyond unimanual impairments and the potential capacity for people to return to prestroke hand roles (i.e., as a manipulator).
AB - Importance: Few tools are available to assess bimanual deficits after stroke. Objective: To develop the Bimanual Assessment Measure (BAM), which assesses a person’s hand coordination in both preferred and prestroke roles (i.e., stabilizer or manipulator). Design: Development and psychometric testing of the BAM. Setting: Research laboratory. Participants: People with chronic stroke (n 5 24), age-matched controls (n 5 23), and occupational therapists (n 5 40). Outcomes and Measures: We assessed the BAM’s internal consistency, reliability, and face and known-groups validity. Results: Items were selected as meaningful tasks that represented a range of bimanual coordination requirements (e.g., symmetrical forces and timing, asymmetrical forces and timing, time-limited reactive movement). Focus groups of people with stroke and occupational therapists provided input into BAM development. The BAM was found to have excellent reliability and internal consistency and face and known-groups validity. Conclusions and Relevance: The BAM is a valid, reliable measure for people with chronic stroke that identifies bimanual coordination deficits beyond unimanual impairments and the potential capacity for people to return to prestroke hand roles (i.e., as a manipulator).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131471687&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5014/ajot.2022.048995
DO - 10.5014/ajot.2022.048995
M3 - Article
C2 - 35671509
AN - SCOPUS:85131471687
SN - 0272-9490
VL - 76
JO - American Journal of Occupational Therapy
JF - American Journal of Occupational Therapy
IS - 4
M1 - 7604205030
ER -