Developing ethical standards for dissemination and implementation research: a roadmap for consensus and guidance

Emmanuel K. Tetteh, Elvin H. Geng, Mark D. Huffman

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

Background: As a relatively new field, dissemination and implementation research has not been included as a separate study design category for ethical consideration compared with clinical and social/behavioral research, yet it should be based on unique study designs, targets of intervention, and corresponding risks. Main text: Research teams conducting dissemination and implementation research have raised important questions related to the responsible conduct of research such as collecting informed consent, site monitoring, identifying and mitigating risks of unintended consequences, and adverse event ascertainment and reporting in dissemination and implementation research. In this commentary, we highlight the need for guidance and consensus standards on ethical issues in dissemination and implementation research and describe some ethical domains and relevant questions in dissemination and implementation research. Additionally, we propose a process for conceptual development and a research agenda to create consensus standards for the responsible conduct of research for dissemination and implementation research. Conclusion: Thorough research is needed to understand the depth of ethical issues in dissemination and implementation research. A consensus-seeking process will be needed to develop new bioethical standards that carefully identify, measure, and mitigate unintended consequences in dissemination and implementation research.

Original languageEnglish
Article number132
JournalImplementation Science Communications
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2023

Keywords

  • Adverse events
  • Bioethics
  • Dissemination and implementation research
  • Informed consent
  • Unintended consequences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Developing ethical standards for dissemination and implementation research: a roadmap for consensus and guidance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this