TY - JOUR
T1 - Determination of leg length discrepancy
T2 - A comparison of weight-bearing and supine imaging
AU - Cleveland, Robert H.
AU - Kushner, David C.
AU - Ogden, Maria C.
AU - Herman, Thomas E.
AU - Kermond, William
AU - Correia, John A.
PY - 1988/4
Y1 - 1988/4
N2 - Leg length discrepancy (LLD) may be determined by comparison of leg (lower extremity) lengths measured during physical exami-nation or by radiographic means. Leg lengths may be measured with the patient in standing, weight-bearing position or in supine position. We used a low dose digital radiographic unit to test the hypothesis that there is a difference in LLD determined from radiographs obtained with the patient standing and those obtained with the patient supine. Conventional physical examination mea-surements also were compared with the radiographic measure-ments. The amount of LLD that is clinically meaningful has not been established, although 10 to 12 mm has been used as a threshold difference of clinical meaningfulness in the past. Analy-sis of our data, using 10 mm as the threshold of difference, reveals high level correlation by linear regression analysis and no signifi-cant difference by t-test between measurements obtained from standing and supine radiographs. A weak correlation and statistical difference existed between each set of radiographic measurements and physical examination measurements.
AB - Leg length discrepancy (LLD) may be determined by comparison of leg (lower extremity) lengths measured during physical exami-nation or by radiographic means. Leg lengths may be measured with the patient in standing, weight-bearing position or in supine position. We used a low dose digital radiographic unit to test the hypothesis that there is a difference in LLD determined from radiographs obtained with the patient standing and those obtained with the patient supine. Conventional physical examination mea-surements also were compared with the radiographic measure-ments. The amount of LLD that is clinically meaningful has not been established, although 10 to 12 mm has been used as a threshold difference of clinical meaningfulness in the past. Analy-sis of our data, using 10 mm as the threshold of difference, reveals high level correlation by linear regression analysis and no signifi-cant difference by t-test between measurements obtained from standing and supine radiographs. A weak correlation and statistical difference existed between each set of radiographic measurements and physical examination measurements.
KW - Digital radiography
KW - Leg length discrepancy
KW - Low back pain
KW - Physical measurements
KW - Radiographic measurements
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023882521&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00004424-198804000-00010
DO - 10.1097/00004424-198804000-00010
M3 - Article
C2 - 3372194
AN - SCOPUS:0023882521
SN - 0020-9996
VL - 23
SP - 301
EP - 304
JO - Investigative Radiology
JF - Investigative Radiology
IS - 4
ER -