Depression, migraine with aura and migraine without aura: Their familiality and interrelatedness

Ha Ball, Z. Samaan, S. Brewster, N. Craddock, M. Gill, A. Korszun, W. Maier, L. Middleton, O. Mors, Mj Owen, J. Perry, M. Preisig, J. Rice, M. Rietschel, L. Jones, I. Jones, Ae Farmer, P. McGuffin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations


Ball HA, Samaan Z, Brewster S, Craddock N, Gill M, Korszun A, Maier W, Middleton L, Mors O, Owen MJ, Perry J, Preisig M, Rice J, Rietschel M, Jones L, Jones I, Farmer AE & McGuffin P. Depression, migraine with aura and migraine without aura: their familiality and interrelatedness. Cephalalgia 2009. London. ISSN 0333-1024 Migraine is frequently comorbid with depression. There appear to be common aetiological factors for both disorders, but the aetiology of migraine within depressed patients, in particular the significance of aura, has been little studied. A large sample of concordantly depressed sibling pairs [the Depression-Network (DeNT) sample] was assessed as having migraine with aura (MA), migraine without aura (MoA), probable migraine or no migraine according to International Headache Society guidelines. Correlations between siblings' migraine status were used to assess the nature of familial liability to migraine. A multiple threshold isocorrelational model fit best, in which different syndromes are conceptualized as different severities of one underlying dimension rather than as having separate aetiologies. Thus, MA and MoA were found to be different forms of the same disorder, with MA occupying the more extreme end of the spectrum of liability. Implications for our understanding of the relationship between migraine and depression are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)848-854
Number of pages7
Issue number8
StatePublished - Aug 2009


  • Comorbidity
  • Depression
  • Genetics
  • Migraine disorders


Dive into the research topics of 'Depression, migraine with aura and migraine without aura: Their familiality and interrelatedness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this