TY - JOUR
T1 - Deep-LIBRA
T2 - An artificial-intelligence method for robust quantification of breast density with independent validation in breast cancer risk assessment
AU - Haji Maghsoudi, Omid
AU - Gastounioti, Aimilia
AU - Scott, Christopher
AU - Pantalone, Lauren
AU - Wu, Fang Fang
AU - Cohen, Eric A.
AU - Winham, Stacey
AU - Conant, Emily F.
AU - Vachon, Celine
AU - Kontos, Despina
N1 - Funding Information:
Computing resources were supported through 1S10OD023495-01 and additional research support was provided by grants R01CA207084-04 (NIH), 5R01CA161749-08 (NIH) and PDF17479714 (Susan G. Komen Foundation). The content of this publication is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of the NIH. Also, we appreciate NVIDIA support for a GPU donation to OHM.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Breast density is an important risk factor for breast cancer that also affects the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography. Current federal legislation mandates reporting of breast density for all women undergoing breast cancer screening. Clinically, breast density is assessed visually using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting And Data System (BI-RADS) scale. Here, we introduce an artificial intelligence (AI) method to estimate breast density from digital mammograms. Our method leverages deep learning using two convolutional neural network architectures to accurately segment the breast area. An AI algorithm combining superpixel generation and radiomic machine learning is then applied to differentiate dense from non-dense tissue regions within the breast, from which breast density is estimated. Our method was trained and validated on a multi-racial, multi-institutional dataset of 15,661 images (4,437 women), and then tested on an independent matched case-control dataset of 6368 digital mammograms (414 cases; 1178 controls) for both breast density estimation and case-control discrimination. On the independent dataset, breast percent density (PD) estimates from Deep-LIBRA and an expert reader were strongly correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.90). Moreover, in a model adjusted for age and BMI, Deep-LIBRA yielded a higher case-control discrimination performance (area under the ROC curve, AUC = 0.612 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.584, 0.640]) compared to four other widely-used research and commercial breast density assessment methods (AUCs = 0.528 to 0.599). Our results suggest a strong agreement of breast density estimates between Deep-LIBRA and gold-standard assessment by an expert reader, as well as improved performance in breast cancer risk assessment over state-of-the-art open-source and commercial methods.
AB - Breast density is an important risk factor for breast cancer that also affects the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography. Current federal legislation mandates reporting of breast density for all women undergoing breast cancer screening. Clinically, breast density is assessed visually using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting And Data System (BI-RADS) scale. Here, we introduce an artificial intelligence (AI) method to estimate breast density from digital mammograms. Our method leverages deep learning using two convolutional neural network architectures to accurately segment the breast area. An AI algorithm combining superpixel generation and radiomic machine learning is then applied to differentiate dense from non-dense tissue regions within the breast, from which breast density is estimated. Our method was trained and validated on a multi-racial, multi-institutional dataset of 15,661 images (4,437 women), and then tested on an independent matched case-control dataset of 6368 digital mammograms (414 cases; 1178 controls) for both breast density estimation and case-control discrimination. On the independent dataset, breast percent density (PD) estimates from Deep-LIBRA and an expert reader were strongly correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.90). Moreover, in a model adjusted for age and BMI, Deep-LIBRA yielded a higher case-control discrimination performance (area under the ROC curve, AUC = 0.612 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.584, 0.640]) compared to four other widely-used research and commercial breast density assessment methods (AUCs = 0.528 to 0.599). Our results suggest a strong agreement of breast density estimates between Deep-LIBRA and gold-standard assessment by an expert reader, as well as improved performance in breast cancer risk assessment over state-of-the-art open-source and commercial methods.
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - Breast cancer risk
KW - Breast density
KW - Deep learning
KW - Digital mammography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110253315&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.media.2021.102138
DO - 10.1016/j.media.2021.102138
M3 - Article
C2 - 34274690
AN - SCOPUS:85110253315
SN - 1361-8415
VL - 73
JO - Medical Image Analysis
JF - Medical Image Analysis
M1 - 102138
ER -