TY - JOUR
T1 - Decreasing deceased donor transplant rates among children (≤6 years) under the new kidney allocation system
AU - Shelton, Brittany A.
AU - Sawinski, Deirdre
AU - Ray, Christopher
AU - Reed, Rhiannon D.
AU - MacLennan, Paul A.
AU - Blackburn, Justin
AU - Young, Carlton J.
AU - Gray, Stephen
AU - Yanik, Megan
AU - Massie, Allan
AU - Segev, Dorry L.
AU - Locke, Jayme E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
PY - 2018/7
Y1 - 2018/7
N2 - The Kidney Allocation System (KAS) was implemented in December 2014 with unknown impact on the pediatric waitlist. To understand the effect of KAS on pediatric registrants, deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) rate was assessed using interrupted time series analysis and time-to-event analysis. Two allocation eras were defined with an intermediary washout period: Era 1 (01/01/2013-09/01/2014), Era 2 (09/01/2014-03/01/2015), and Era 3(03/01/2015-03/01/2017). When using Cox proportional hazards, there was no significant association between allocation era and DDKT likelihood as compared to Era 1 (Era 3: aHR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.97-1.18, P =.17). However, this was not consistent across all subgroups. Specifically, while highly sensitized pediatric registrants were consistently less likely to be transplanted than their less sensitized counterparts, this disparity was attenuated in Era 3 (Era 1 aHR: 0.04, 95%CI: 0.01-0.14, P <.001; Era 3 aHR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.21-0.53, P <.001) whereas the youngest registrants aged 0-6 experienced a 21% decrease in DDKT likelihood in Era 3 as compared to Era 1 (aHR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.64-0.98, P =.03). Thus, while overall DDKT likelihood remained stable with the introduction of KAS, registrants ≤ 6 years of age were disadvantaged, warranting further study to ensure equitable access to transplantation.
AB - The Kidney Allocation System (KAS) was implemented in December 2014 with unknown impact on the pediatric waitlist. To understand the effect of KAS on pediatric registrants, deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) rate was assessed using interrupted time series analysis and time-to-event analysis. Two allocation eras were defined with an intermediary washout period: Era 1 (01/01/2013-09/01/2014), Era 2 (09/01/2014-03/01/2015), and Era 3(03/01/2015-03/01/2017). When using Cox proportional hazards, there was no significant association between allocation era and DDKT likelihood as compared to Era 1 (Era 3: aHR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.97-1.18, P =.17). However, this was not consistent across all subgroups. Specifically, while highly sensitized pediatric registrants were consistently less likely to be transplanted than their less sensitized counterparts, this disparity was attenuated in Era 3 (Era 1 aHR: 0.04, 95%CI: 0.01-0.14, P <.001; Era 3 aHR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.21-0.53, P <.001) whereas the youngest registrants aged 0-6 experienced a 21% decrease in DDKT likelihood in Era 3 as compared to Era 1 (aHR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.64-0.98, P =.03). Thus, while overall DDKT likelihood remained stable with the introduction of KAS, registrants ≤ 6 years of age were disadvantaged, warranting further study to ensure equitable access to transplantation.
KW - health services and outcomes research
KW - kidney transplantation/nephrology
KW - organ allocation
KW - patient survival
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041670715&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ajt.14663
DO - 10.1111/ajt.14663
M3 - Article
C2 - 29333639
AN - SCOPUS:85041670715
SN - 1600-6135
VL - 18
SP - 1690
EP - 1698
JO - American Journal of Transplantation
JF - American Journal of Transplantation
IS - 7
ER -