TY - JOUR
T1 - Deconstructing autism
T2 - from unitary syndrome to contributory developmental endophenotypes
AU - Constantino, John N.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number [U54 HD087011] to the Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at Washington University.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2018/1/2
Y1 - 2018/1/2
N2 - A recent generation of family studies has revealed that autism can be predicted from an array of neurobehavioural susceptibilities that are appreciable before the syndrome is diagnosed, and that each may be traceable to partially-independent sets of genetic variation. Some of these liabilities are not necessarily specific to ASD—those that are non-specific could account fo. significant share of the ‘missing heritability’ of autism, would (by definition) contribute to pleiotropy, and relate to so-called ‘co-morbidities’, which are inappropriately named if they actually contribute to (or exacerbate) the severity of autism itself. Linking genetic variants to these underlying traits rather than t. diagnosis of ‘autism’ may be more productive in devising personalized approaches to developmental intervention, especially if autism represents an epiphenomenon of earlier-interacting susceptibilities. In this article, the implications of conceptualizing autism a. syndrome of neurobehavioural degeneration is considered, predicated on the notion that it can arise fro. critical co-aggregation of earlier-interacting neuropsychiatric liabilities, the phenotypic expression of which—importantly—can be moderated by sex.
AB - A recent generation of family studies has revealed that autism can be predicted from an array of neurobehavioural susceptibilities that are appreciable before the syndrome is diagnosed, and that each may be traceable to partially-independent sets of genetic variation. Some of these liabilities are not necessarily specific to ASD—those that are non-specific could account fo. significant share of the ‘missing heritability’ of autism, would (by definition) contribute to pleiotropy, and relate to so-called ‘co-morbidities’, which are inappropriately named if they actually contribute to (or exacerbate) the severity of autism itself. Linking genetic variants to these underlying traits rather than t. diagnosis of ‘autism’ may be more productive in devising personalized approaches to developmental intervention, especially if autism represents an epiphenomenon of earlier-interacting susceptibilities. In this article, the implications of conceptualizing autism a. syndrome of neurobehavioural degeneration is considered, predicated on the notion that it can arise fro. critical co-aggregation of earlier-interacting neuropsychiatric liabilities, the phenotypic expression of which—importantly—can be moderated by sex.
KW - Autism spectrum disorder
KW - development
KW - endophenotype
KW - genetics
KW - personalized medicine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042918040&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09540261.2018.1433133
DO - 10.1080/09540261.2018.1433133
M3 - Review article
C2 - 29498298
AN - SCOPUS:85042918040
SN - 0954-0261
VL - 30
SP - 18
EP - 24
JO - International Review of Psychiatry
JF - International Review of Psychiatry
IS - 1
ER -