TY - JOUR
T1 - Debate
T2 - Midwestern Vascular Surgery Society Meeting, September 10, 2004, Omaha, Nebraska
AU - Rubin, Brian
PY - 2005/9
Y1 - 2005/9
N2 - This article is the result of a debate. The motion proposed was “Infrainguinal endovascular procedures should be reserved for patients who do not have good open surgical options.” Arguments in favor of the motion were offered by Daniel J. Reddy of Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, Ml, and arguments against the motion were offered by Peter Kalman of Loyola University Medical Center in Maywood, IL.
AB - This article is the result of a debate. The motion proposed was “Infrainguinal endovascular procedures should be reserved for patients who do not have good open surgical options.” Arguments in favor of the motion were offered by Daniel J. Reddy of Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, Ml, and arguments against the motion were offered by Peter Kalman of Loyola University Medical Center in Maywood, IL.
KW - infrainguinal endovascular procedures
KW - open surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646349760&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/153100350501700314
DO - 10.1177/153100350501700314
M3 - Article
C2 - 16273166
AN - SCOPUS:33646349760
SN - 1531-0035
VL - 17
SP - 237
EP - 244
JO - Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy
JF - Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy
IS - 3
ER -