Debate: Midwestern Vascular Surgery Society Meeting, September 10, 2004, Omaha, Nebraska

Brian Rubin

doi:10.1177/153100350501700314

Debate: Midwestern Vascular Surgery Society Meeting, September 10, 2004, Omaha, Nebraska

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

This article is the result of a debate. The motion proposed was “Infrainguinal endovascular procedures should be reserved for patients who do not have good open surgical options.” Arguments in favor of the motion were offered by Daniel J. Reddy of Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, Ml, and arguments against the motion were offered by Peter Kalman of Loyola University Medical Center in Maywood, IL.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	237-244
Number of pages	8
Journal	Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy
Volume	17
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/153100350501700314
State	Published - Sep 2005
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

infrainguinal endovascular procedures
open surgery

Access to Document

10.1177/153100350501700314

Link to publication in Scopus

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Debate: Midwestern Vascular Surgery Society Meeting, September 10, 2004, Omaha, Nebraska'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Rubin, B. (2005). Debate: Midwestern Vascular Surgery Society Meeting, September 10, 2004, Omaha, Nebraska. Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy, 17(3), 237-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/153100350501700314

@article{bf4a8a61c9f443c8a288092b70dd1864,

title = "Debate: Midwestern Vascular Surgery Society Meeting, September 10, 2004, Omaha, Nebraska",

abstract = "This article is the result of a debate. The motion proposed was “Infrainguinal endovascular procedures should be reserved for patients who do not have good open surgical options.” Arguments in favor of the motion were offered by Daniel J. Reddy of Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, Ml, and arguments against the motion were offered by Peter Kalman of Loyola University Medical Center in Maywood, IL.",

keywords = "infrainguinal endovascular procedures, open surgery",

author = "Brian Rubin",

year = "2005",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1177/153100350501700314",

language = "English",

volume = "17",

pages = "237--244",

journal = "Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy",

issn = "1531-0035",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Debate

T2 - Midwestern Vascular Surgery Society Meeting, September 10, 2004, Omaha, Nebraska

AU - Rubin, Brian

PY - 2005/9

Y1 - 2005/9

N2 - This article is the result of a debate. The motion proposed was “Infrainguinal endovascular procedures should be reserved for patients who do not have good open surgical options.” Arguments in favor of the motion were offered by Daniel J. Reddy of Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, Ml, and arguments against the motion were offered by Peter Kalman of Loyola University Medical Center in Maywood, IL.

AB - This article is the result of a debate. The motion proposed was “Infrainguinal endovascular procedures should be reserved for patients who do not have good open surgical options.” Arguments in favor of the motion were offered by Daniel J. Reddy of Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, Ml, and arguments against the motion were offered by Peter Kalman of Loyola University Medical Center in Maywood, IL.

KW - infrainguinal endovascular procedures

KW - open surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646349760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/153100350501700314

DO - 10.1177/153100350501700314

M3 - Article

C2 - 16273166

AN - SCOPUS:33646349760

VL - 17

SP - 237

EP - 244

JO - Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy

JF - Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy

SN - 1531-0035

IS - 3

ER -