Debate: Midwestern Vascular Surgery Society Meeting, September 10, 2004, Omaha, Nebraska

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article is the result of a debate. The motion proposed was “Infrainguinal endovascular procedures should be reserved for patients who do not have good open surgical options.” Arguments in favor of the motion were offered by Daniel J. Reddy of Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, Ml, and arguments against the motion were offered by Peter Kalman of Loyola University Medical Center in Maywood, IL.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)237-244
Number of pages8
JournalPerspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2005
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • infrainguinal endovascular procedures
  • open surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Debate: Midwestern Vascular Surgery Society Meeting, September 10, 2004, Omaha, Nebraska'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this