TY - JOUR
T1 - Daratumumab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
T2 - The GRIFFIN trial
AU - Voorhees, Peter M.
AU - Kaufman, Jonathan L.
AU - Laubach, Jacob
AU - Sborov, Douglas W.
AU - Reeves, Brandi
AU - Rodriguez, Cesar
AU - Chari, Ajai
AU - Silbermann, Rebecca
AU - Costa, Luciano J.
AU - Anderson, Larry D.
AU - Nathwani, Nitya
AU - Shah, Nina
AU - Efebera, Yvonne A.
AU - Holstein, Sarah A.
AU - Costello, Caitlin
AU - Jakubowiak, Andrzej
AU - Wildes, Tanya M.
AU - Orlowski, Robert Z.
AU - Shain, Kenneth H.
AU - Cowan, Andrew J.
AU - Murphy, Sean
AU - Lutska, Yana
AU - Pei, Huiling
AU - Ukropec, Jon
AU - Vermeulen, Jessica
AU - Boer, Carla de
AU - Hoehn, Daniela
AU - Lin, Thomas S.
AU - Richardson, Paul G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology
PY - 2020/8/20
Y1 - 2020/8/20
N2 - Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is standard frontline therapy for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). The addition of daratumumab (D) to RVd (D-RVd) in transplant-eligible NDMM patients was evaluated. Patients (N 5 207) were randomized 1:1 to D-RVd or RVd induction (4 cycles), ASCT, D-RVd or RVd consolidation (2 cycles), and lenalidomide or lenalidomide plus D maintenance (26 cycles). The primary end point, stringent complete response (sCR) rate by the end of post-ASCT consolidation, favored D-RVd vs RVd (42.4% vs 32.0%; odds ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-2.82; 1-sided P 5 .068) and met the prespecified 1-sided a of 0.10. With longer follow-up (median, 22.1 months), responses deepened; sCR rates improved for D-RVd vs RVd (62.6% vs 45.4%; P 5 .0177), as did minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (1025 threshold) rates in the intent-to-treat population (51.0% vs 20.4%; P < .0001). Four patients (3.8%) in the D-RVd group and 7 patients (6.8%) in the RVd group progressed; respective 24-month progression-free survival rates were 95.8% and 89.8%. Grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events were more common with D-RVd. More infections occurred with D-RVd, but grade 3/4 infection rates were similar. Median CD341 cell yield was 8.2 3 106/kg for D-RVd and 9.4 3 106/kg for RVd, although plerixafor use was more common with D-RVd. Median times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were comparable. Daratumumab with RVd induction and consolidation improved depth of response in patients with transplant-eligible NDMM, with no new safety concerns. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02874742. (Blood.
AB - Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is standard frontline therapy for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). The addition of daratumumab (D) to RVd (D-RVd) in transplant-eligible NDMM patients was evaluated. Patients (N 5 207) were randomized 1:1 to D-RVd or RVd induction (4 cycles), ASCT, D-RVd or RVd consolidation (2 cycles), and lenalidomide or lenalidomide plus D maintenance (26 cycles). The primary end point, stringent complete response (sCR) rate by the end of post-ASCT consolidation, favored D-RVd vs RVd (42.4% vs 32.0%; odds ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-2.82; 1-sided P 5 .068) and met the prespecified 1-sided a of 0.10. With longer follow-up (median, 22.1 months), responses deepened; sCR rates improved for D-RVd vs RVd (62.6% vs 45.4%; P 5 .0177), as did minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (1025 threshold) rates in the intent-to-treat population (51.0% vs 20.4%; P < .0001). Four patients (3.8%) in the D-RVd group and 7 patients (6.8%) in the RVd group progressed; respective 24-month progression-free survival rates were 95.8% and 89.8%. Grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events were more common with D-RVd. More infections occurred with D-RVd, but grade 3/4 infection rates were similar. Median CD341 cell yield was 8.2 3 106/kg for D-RVd and 9.4 3 106/kg for RVd, although plerixafor use was more common with D-RVd. Median times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were comparable. Daratumumab with RVd induction and consolidation improved depth of response in patients with transplant-eligible NDMM, with no new safety concerns. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02874742. (Blood.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087138059&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1182/blood.2020005288
DO - 10.1182/blood.2020005288
M3 - Article
C2 - 32325490
AN - SCOPUS:85087138059
SN - 0006-4971
VL - 136
SP - 936
EP - 945
JO - Blood
JF - Blood
IS - 8
ER -