Bone formation in a variety of contexts depends on angiogenesis; however, there are few reports of the vascular response to osteogenic skeletal loading. We used the rat forelimb compression model to characterize vascular changes after fatigue loading. The right forelimbs of 72 adult rats were loaded cyclically in vivo to one of four displacement levels, to produce four discrete levels of ulnar damage. Rats were killed 3-14 days after loading, and their vasculature was perfused with silicone rubber. Transverse histological sections were cut along the ulnar diaphysis. We quantified vessel number, average vessel area, total vessel area, and bone area. On day 3, we observed a dramatic periosteal expansion near the ulnar midshaft, with significant increases in periosteal vascularity; total vessel area was increased 250-450% (P < 0.001). Vascularity remained elevated on days 7 and 14. Vessel number and average vessel area were not correlated (P = 0.09) and contributed independently to total vascular increases. Bone area was not increased on day 3 but on days 7 and 14 was increased significantly in all displacement groups (P < 0.01) due to periosteal woven bone formation. Vascular and bone changes depended on longitudinal location (P < 0.001), with peak increases 2 mm distal to the midshaft. Vascular and bone changes also depended on displacement level (P < 0.005), with greater increases at higher levels of fatigue displacement. We conclude that skeletal fatigue loading induces a rapid increase in periosteal vascularity, followed by an increase in bone area. The angiogenic-osteogenic response is spatially coordinated and scaled to the level of the mechanical stimulus.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)391-399
Number of pages9
JournalCalcified Tissue International
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 2007


  • Bone formation
  • Fatigue loading
  • Periosteal vascularity
  • Rat
  • Ulna


Dive into the research topics of 'Damaging fatigue loading stimulates increases in periosteal vascularity at sites of bone formation in the rat ulna'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this