TY - JOUR
T1 - D-Mannose for Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection Prevention in Postmenopausal Women Using Vaginal Estrogen
T2 - A Randomized Controlled Trial
AU - Lenger, Stacy M.
AU - Chu, Christine M.
AU - Ghetti, Chiara
AU - Durkin, Michael J.
AU - Jennings, Zoe
AU - Wan, Fei
AU - Sutcliffe, Siobhan
AU - Lowder, Jerry L.
N1 - Funding Information:
M.J.D. was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) of the National Institutes of Health under award number KL2TR002346. S.S. was supported by the Foundation for Barnes-Jewish Hospital, NCATS (UL1 TR002345), and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center (P30 CA091842). F.W. was supported by the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center (P30 CA091842). Research reported in this publication was supported by the NCATS (UL1 TR002345). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or other funding sources. These funding sources were not involved in the research, collection, analysis, data interpretation, manuscript writing, or decision to submit the article for publication. The study itself was funded by divisional funding.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the Author(s).
PY - 2023/3/1
Y1 - 2023/3/1
N2 - Importance: Further research is needed to determine whether d-mannose plus vaginal estrogen therapy (VET) is beneficial over VET alone for recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI) prevention. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate d-mannose efficacy for rUTI prevention in postmenopausal women using VET. Study Design: We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing d-mannose (2 g/d) with control. Participants were required to have a history of uncomplicated rUTIs and to remain on VET throughout the trial. They were followed up 90 days for incident UTIs. Cumulative UTI incidences were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by Cox proportional hazards regression. For the planned interim analysis, P < 0.001 was considered statistically significant. Futility analysis was performed by generating post hoc conditional power for multiple scenarios. Results: We evaluated 545 patients for frequent/recurrent UTIs from March 1, 2018, to January 18, 2020. Of these women, 213 had culture-proven rUTIs, 71 were eligible, 57 enrolled, 44 began their planned 90-day study period, and 32 completed the study. At interim analysis, the overall cumulative UTI incidence was 46.6%; 41.1% in the treatment arm (median time to first UTI, 24 days) and 50.4% in the control arm (median, 21 days); hazard ratio, 0.76; 99.9% confidence interval, 0.15-3.97. d-Mannose was well tolerated with high participant adherence. Futility analysis suggested the study lacked power to detect the planned (25%) or observed (9%) difference as statistically significant; the study was halted before conclusion. Conclusions: d-Mannose is a well-Tolerated nutraceutical, but further research is needed to determine whether d-mannose in combination with VET has a significant, beneficial effect beyond VET alone in postmenopausal women with rUTIs.
AB - Importance: Further research is needed to determine whether d-mannose plus vaginal estrogen therapy (VET) is beneficial over VET alone for recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI) prevention. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate d-mannose efficacy for rUTI prevention in postmenopausal women using VET. Study Design: We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing d-mannose (2 g/d) with control. Participants were required to have a history of uncomplicated rUTIs and to remain on VET throughout the trial. They were followed up 90 days for incident UTIs. Cumulative UTI incidences were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by Cox proportional hazards regression. For the planned interim analysis, P < 0.001 was considered statistically significant. Futility analysis was performed by generating post hoc conditional power for multiple scenarios. Results: We evaluated 545 patients for frequent/recurrent UTIs from March 1, 2018, to January 18, 2020. Of these women, 213 had culture-proven rUTIs, 71 were eligible, 57 enrolled, 44 began their planned 90-day study period, and 32 completed the study. At interim analysis, the overall cumulative UTI incidence was 46.6%; 41.1% in the treatment arm (median time to first UTI, 24 days) and 50.4% in the control arm (median, 21 days); hazard ratio, 0.76; 99.9% confidence interval, 0.15-3.97. d-Mannose was well tolerated with high participant adherence. Futility analysis suggested the study lacked power to detect the planned (25%) or observed (9%) difference as statistically significant; the study was halted before conclusion. Conclusions: d-Mannose is a well-Tolerated nutraceutical, but further research is needed to determine whether d-mannose in combination with VET has a significant, beneficial effect beyond VET alone in postmenopausal women with rUTIs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148869887&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001270
DO - 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001270
M3 - Article
C2 - 36808931
AN - SCOPUS:85148869887
SN - 2771-1897
VL - 29
SP - 367
EP - 377
JO - Urogynecology
JF - Urogynecology
IS - 3
ER -