Cycling empirical antimicrobial agents to prevent emergence of antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative bacteria among intensive care unit patients

David K. Warren, Holly A. Hill, Liana R. Merz, Marin H. Kollef, Mary K. Hayden, Victoria J. Fraser, Scott K. Fridkin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

95 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To determine the impact of the rotation of antimicrobial agents on the rates of infection, intestinal colonization, and acquisition with antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Design: Pre- and postintervention design. Setting: A 19-bed, medical intensive care unit Patients: Individuals admitted to the study unit for >48 hrs. Interventions: After a 5-month baseline observation period, four classes of antimicrobial agents with Gram-negative activity were cycled at 3- to 4-month intervals for 24 months. Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was the acquisition rate of antimicrobial resistance among Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa obtained from rectal swab cultures performed on admission, weekly during the patients' stay, and at discharge. Rates and microbiology of nosocomial bloodstream infections and ventilator-associated pneumonia were also compared between baseline and cycling periods. The cycling program resulted in a significant change in prescribing practices; the predominant agent used changed with each cycle. Among study patients who were not already colonised with a resistant organism, the rate of acquisition of enteric colonization with bacteria resistant to any of the target drugs remained stable during the cycling period for P. aeruginosa (relative rate, 0.96; 95% confidence Interval, 0.47-2.16) and Enterobacteriaceae (relative rate, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-3.43). Hospital-wide, P. aeruginosa from routine clinical cultures resistant to the target drugs increased during the cycling period. The proportion of Gram-negative bacteria isolated from cases of nosocomial bloodstream infection (29% baseline vs. 26% cycling; p = .11) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (80% vs. 41%; p = .06) did not significantly differ. Conclusions: In this study, antimicrobial cycling did not result in a significant change in enteric acquisition of resistant Gram-negative bacteria among intensive care unit patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2450-2456
Number of pages7
JournalCritical care medicine
Volume32
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2004

Keywords

  • Antimicrobial cycling
  • Antimicrobial resistance
  • Gram-negative bacteria
  • Intensive care unit

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cycling empirical antimicrobial agents to prevent emergence of antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative bacteria among intensive care unit patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this