TY - JOUR
T1 - Curricular priorities for business ethics in medical practice and research
T2 - Recommendations from Delphi consensus panels
AU - DuBois, James M.
AU - Kraus, Elena M.
AU - Gursahani, Kamal
AU - Mikulec, Anthony
AU - Bakanas, Erin
N1 - Funding Information:
-Pressures to obtain grant and contract funding
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 DuBois et a.
PY - 2014/11/15
Y1 - 2014/11/15
N2 - Background: No published curricula in the area of medical business ethics exist. This is surprising given tha physicians wrestle daily with business decisions and that professional associations, the Institute of Medicine, Healt and Human Services, Congress, and industry have issued related guidelines over the past 5 years. To fill this gap the authors aimed (1) to identify the full range of medical business ethics topics that experts consider important t teach, and (2) to establish curricular priorities through expert consensus Methods: In spring 2012, the authors conducted an online Delphi survey with two heterogeneous panels o experts recruited in the United States. One panel focused on business ethics in medical practice (n = 14), and focused on business ethics in medical research (n = 12) Results: Panel 1 generated an initial list of 14 major topics related to business ethics in medical practice, an subsequently rated 6 topics as very important or essential to teach. Panel 2 generated an initial list of 10 majo topics related to business ethics in medical research, and subsequently rated 5 as very important or essential. I both domains, the panel strongly recommended addressing problems that conflicts of interest can cause, lega guidelines, and the goals or ideals of the profession Conclusions: The Bander Center for Medical Business Ethics at Saint Louis University will use the results of th Delphi panel to develop online curricular resources for each of the highest rated topics.
AB - Background: No published curricula in the area of medical business ethics exist. This is surprising given tha physicians wrestle daily with business decisions and that professional associations, the Institute of Medicine, Healt and Human Services, Congress, and industry have issued related guidelines over the past 5 years. To fill this gap the authors aimed (1) to identify the full range of medical business ethics topics that experts consider important t teach, and (2) to establish curricular priorities through expert consensus Methods: In spring 2012, the authors conducted an online Delphi survey with two heterogeneous panels o experts recruited in the United States. One panel focused on business ethics in medical practice (n = 14), and focused on business ethics in medical research (n = 12) Results: Panel 1 generated an initial list of 14 major topics related to business ethics in medical practice, an subsequently rated 6 topics as very important or essential to teach. Panel 2 generated an initial list of 10 majo topics related to business ethics in medical research, and subsequently rated 5 as very important or essential. I both domains, the panel strongly recommended addressing problems that conflicts of interest can cause, lega guidelines, and the goals or ideals of the profession Conclusions: The Bander Center for Medical Business Ethics at Saint Louis University will use the results of th Delphi panel to develop online curricular resources for each of the highest rated topics.
KW - Business in medicine
KW - Clinical ethics
KW - Delphi consensus
KW - Graduate medical education
KW - Healthcare industry
KW - Medical business ethics
KW - Medical education
KW - Medical ethics
KW - Professional ethics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964312790&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1472-6920-14-235
DO - 10.1186/1472-6920-14-235
M3 - Article
C2 - 25398388
AN - SCOPUS:84964312790
SN - 1472-6920
VL - 14
JO - BMC Medical Education
JF - BMC Medical Education
IS - 1
M1 - 235
ER -