CTLA-4-Fc treatment of ongoing EAE improves recovery, but has no effect upon relapse rate. Implications for the mechanisms involved in disease perpetuation

Anne H. Cross, Manuel San, Richard M. Keeling, Robert W. Karr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Several laboratories including ours have shown that T cell co- stimulation mediated through B7-1 or B7-2 is critical to the initiation of EAE. The role of T cell co-stimulation in ongoing EAE is less clear. In the present study, 32 mice with established EAE were randomly assigned to receive treatment with either CTLA-4-Fc or control Ig. Mice were followed daily by clinical scoring for 2 months post-immunization. A significant improvement in the degree of recovery following the acute episode and following relapses of EAE was observed in those mice randomized to CTLA-4-Fc treatment. Full clinical remission occurred twice as often in the CTLA-4-Fc group as in those mice receiving placebo, whereas placebo-treated mice were more likely to develop a stable prolonged neurologic deficit. Serial clinical scoring revealed no effect of CTLA-4-Fc upon relapse rate, with greater than 80% of the mice in each group displaying at least one clinical EAE relapse. In that the activation of memory T cells is relatively independent of T cell co- stimulation, these results indicate that development of chronic disease is associated with the activation of naive T cells and the recruitment of the latter cells into the disease process. Blocking B7 molecules may be beneficial in the treatment of established CNS inflammatory demyelinating diseases such as multiple sclerosis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)144-147
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Neuroimmunology
Volume96
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 3 1999

Keywords

  • CTLA-4- Ig
  • Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis
  • Multiple sclerosis
  • T cell co-stimulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'CTLA-4-Fc treatment of ongoing EAE improves recovery, but has no effect upon relapse rate. Implications for the mechanisms involved in disease perpetuation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this