TY - JOUR
T1 - CSF biomarker variability in the Alzheimer's Association quality control program
AU - Alzheimer's Association QC Program Work Group
AU - Mattsson, Niklas
AU - Andreasson, Ulf
AU - Persson, Staffan
AU - Carrillo, Maria C.
AU - Collins, Steven
AU - Chalbot, Sonia
AU - Cutler, Neal
AU - Dufour-Rainfray, Diane
AU - Fagan, Anne M.
AU - Heegaard, Niels H.H.
AU - Robin Hsiung, Ging Yuek
AU - Hyman, Bradley
AU - Iqbal, Khalid
AU - Lachno, D. Richard
AU - Lleó, Alberto
AU - Lewczuk, Piotr
AU - Molinuevo, José L.
AU - Parchi, Piero
AU - Regeniter, Axel
AU - Rissman, Robert
AU - Rosenmann, Hanna
AU - Sancesario, Giuseppe
AU - Schröder, Johannes
AU - Shaw, Leslie M.
AU - Teunissen, Charlotte E.
AU - Trojanowski, John Q.
AU - Vanderstichele, Hugo
AU - Vandijck, Manu
AU - Verbeek, Marcel M.
AU - Zetterberg, Henrik
AU - Blennow, Kaj
AU - Rojo, Aladro José A.
AU - Albert, Marilyn
AU - Alcolea, Daniel
AU - Antonell, Anna
AU - Arai, Hiroyuki
AU - Archetti, Silvana
AU - Arkblad, Eva
AU - Baldeiras, Inês
AU - Bartos, Ales
AU - Batish, Dev
AU - Bedel, Aurélie
AU - Bentue-Ferrer, Daniele
AU - Berisha, Flora
AU - Bernardini, Sergio
AU - Blankenstein, Marinus
AU - Bousiges, Olivier
AU - Camuso, Michael C.
AU - Casoli, Tiziana
AU - Holtzman, David
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Åsa Källen, Monica Christiansson, Sara Hullberg, and Dzemila Secic for excellent technical assistance. A generous grant from an anonymous donor to the Alzheimer's Association supported this study.
PY - 2013/5/1
Y1 - 2013/5/1
N2 - Background: The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers amyloid beta 1-42, total tau, and phosphorylated tau are used increasingly for Alzheimer's disease (AD) research and patient management. However, there are large variations in biomarker measurements among and within laboratories. Methods: Data from the first nine rounds of the Alzheimer's Association quality control program was used to define the extent and sources of analytical variability. In each round, three CSF samples prepared at the Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (Mölndal, Sweden) were analyzed by single-analyte enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), a multiplexing xMAP assay, or an immunoassay with electrochemoluminescence detection. Results: A total of 84 laboratories participated. Coefficients of variation (CVs) between laboratories were around 20% to 30%; within-run CVs, less than 5% to 10%; and longitudinal within-laboratory CVs, 5% to 19%. Interestingly, longitudinal within-laboratory CV differed between biomarkers at individual laboratories, suggesting that a component of it was assay dependent. Variability between kit lots and between laboratories both had a major influence on amyloid beta 1-42 measurements, but for total tau and phosphorylated tau, between-kit lot effects were much less than between-laboratory effects. Despite the measurement variability, the between-laboratory consistency in classification of samples (using prehoc-derived cutoffs for AD) was high (>90% in 15 of 18 samples for ELISA and in 12 of 18 samples for xMAP). Conclusions: The overall variability remains too high to allow assignment of universal biomarker cutoff values for a specific intended use. Each laboratory must ensure longitudinal stability in its measurements and use internally qualified cutoff levels. Further standardization of laboratory procedures and improvement of kit performance will likely increase the usefulness of CSF AD biomarkers for researchers and clinicians.
AB - Background: The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers amyloid beta 1-42, total tau, and phosphorylated tau are used increasingly for Alzheimer's disease (AD) research and patient management. However, there are large variations in biomarker measurements among and within laboratories. Methods: Data from the first nine rounds of the Alzheimer's Association quality control program was used to define the extent and sources of analytical variability. In each round, three CSF samples prepared at the Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (Mölndal, Sweden) were analyzed by single-analyte enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), a multiplexing xMAP assay, or an immunoassay with electrochemoluminescence detection. Results: A total of 84 laboratories participated. Coefficients of variation (CVs) between laboratories were around 20% to 30%; within-run CVs, less than 5% to 10%; and longitudinal within-laboratory CVs, 5% to 19%. Interestingly, longitudinal within-laboratory CV differed between biomarkers at individual laboratories, suggesting that a component of it was assay dependent. Variability between kit lots and between laboratories both had a major influence on amyloid beta 1-42 measurements, but for total tau and phosphorylated tau, between-kit lot effects were much less than between-laboratory effects. Despite the measurement variability, the between-laboratory consistency in classification of samples (using prehoc-derived cutoffs for AD) was high (>90% in 15 of 18 samples for ELISA and in 12 of 18 samples for xMAP). Conclusions: The overall variability remains too high to allow assignment of universal biomarker cutoff values for a specific intended use. Each laboratory must ensure longitudinal stability in its measurements and use internally qualified cutoff levels. Further standardization of laboratory procedures and improvement of kit performance will likely increase the usefulness of CSF AD biomarkers for researchers and clinicians.
KW - Alzheimer's disease
KW - Biomarkers
KW - Cerebrospinal fluid
KW - External assurance
KW - Proficiency testing
KW - Quality control
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876909712&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.01.010
DO - 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.01.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 23622690
AN - SCOPUS:84876909712
SN - 1552-5260
VL - 9
SP - 251
EP - 261
JO - Alzheimer's and Dementia
JF - Alzheimer's and Dementia
IS - 3
ER -