TY - JOUR
T1 - Cross-priming induces immunodomination in the presence of viral MHC class I inhibition
AU - Lauron, Elvin J.
AU - Yang, Liping
AU - Elliott, Jabari I.
AU - Gainey, Maria D.
AU - Fremont, Daved H.
AU - Yokoyama, Wayne M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Lauron et al.
PY - 2018/2
Y1 - 2018/2
N2 - Viruses have evolved mechanisms of MHCI inhibition in order to evade recognition by cytotoxic CD8+T cells (CTLs), which is well-illustrated by our prior studies on cowpox virus (CPXV) that encodes potent MHCI inhibitors. Deletion of CPXV viral MHCI inhibitors markedly attenuated in vivo infection due to effects on CTL effector function, not priming. However, the CTL response to CPXV in C57BL/6 mice is dominated by a single peptide antigen presented by H-2Kb. Here we evaluated the effect of viral MHCI inhibition on immunodominant (IDE) and subdominant epitopes (SDE) as this has not been thoroughly examined. We found that cross-priming, but not cross-dressing, is the main mechanism driving IDE and SDE CTL responses following CPXV infection. Secretion of the immunodominant antigen was not required for immunodominance. Instead, immunodominance was caused by CTL interference, known as immunodomination. Both immunodomination and cross-priming of SDEs were not affected by MHCI inhibition. SDE-specific CTLs were also capable of exerting immunodomination during primary and secondary responses, which was in part dependent on antigen abundance. Furthermore, CTL responses directed solely against SDEs protected against lethal CPXV infection, but only in the absence of the CPXV MHCI inhibitors. Thus, both SDE and IDE responses can contribute to protective immunity against poxviruses, implying that these principles apply to poxvirus-based vaccines.
AB - Viruses have evolved mechanisms of MHCI inhibition in order to evade recognition by cytotoxic CD8+T cells (CTLs), which is well-illustrated by our prior studies on cowpox virus (CPXV) that encodes potent MHCI inhibitors. Deletion of CPXV viral MHCI inhibitors markedly attenuated in vivo infection due to effects on CTL effector function, not priming. However, the CTL response to CPXV in C57BL/6 mice is dominated by a single peptide antigen presented by H-2Kb. Here we evaluated the effect of viral MHCI inhibition on immunodominant (IDE) and subdominant epitopes (SDE) as this has not been thoroughly examined. We found that cross-priming, but not cross-dressing, is the main mechanism driving IDE and SDE CTL responses following CPXV infection. Secretion of the immunodominant antigen was not required for immunodominance. Instead, immunodominance was caused by CTL interference, known as immunodomination. Both immunodomination and cross-priming of SDEs were not affected by MHCI inhibition. SDE-specific CTLs were also capable of exerting immunodomination during primary and secondary responses, which was in part dependent on antigen abundance. Furthermore, CTL responses directed solely against SDEs protected against lethal CPXV infection, but only in the absence of the CPXV MHCI inhibitors. Thus, both SDE and IDE responses can contribute to protective immunity against poxviruses, implying that these principles apply to poxvirus-based vaccines.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042720111&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006883
DO - 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006883
M3 - Article
C2 - 29444189
AN - SCOPUS:85042720111
SN - 1553-7366
VL - 14
JO - PLoS pathogens
JF - PLoS pathogens
IS - 2
M1 - e1006883
ER -