Critical Care telemedicine: Evolution and state of the art

Craig M. Lilly, Marc T. Zubrow, Kenneth M. Kempner, H. Neal Reynolds, Sanjay Subramanian, Evert A. Eriksson, Crystal L. Jenkins, Teresa A. Rincon, Benjamin A. Kohl, Robert H. Groves, Elizabeth R. Cowboy, Kamana E. Mbekeani, Mark J. McDonald, Dominick A. Rascona, Michael H. Ries, Herbert J. Rogove, Ahmed E. Badr, Isabelle C. Kopec, Kathleen M. Baker, Craig M. CoopersmithKerry Copeland, Jay S. Cowen, Jim M. Curtis, Michael A. De Georgia, Clifford S. Deutschman, Lori A. Harmon, Charles K. Hu, Jane Marie Hughes, Maria L. Jison, Sarah Kraus, Paul A. Lange, Stephen C. Matchett, Piyush Mathur, Janine M. Mazabob, Vinay M. Nadkarni, Loren D. Nelson, Elizabeth Oshinson, Richard R. Riker, George A. Sample, Valerie Seabaugh, James P. Shaffer, Joseph F. Sucher, Lisa M. Weavind, Steve M. Wyatt, Jean Pierre Yared

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

79 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: To review the growth and current penetration of ICU telemedicine programs, association with outcomes, studies of their impact on medical education, associations with medicolegal risks, identify program revenue sources and costs, regulatory aspects, and the ICU telemedicine research agenda. Data Sources: Review of the published medical literature, governmental documents, and opinions of experts from the Society of Critical Care Medicine ICU Telemedicine Committee. Data Synthesis: Formal ICU telemedicine programs now support 11% of nonfederal hospital critically ill adult patients. There is increasingly robust evidence of association with lower ICU (0.79; 95% CI, 0.65-0.96) and hospital mortality (0.83; 95% CI, 0.73-0.94) and shorter ICU (-0.62 d; 95% CI, -1.21 to -0.04 d) and hospital (-1.26 d; 95% CI, -2.49 to -0.03 d) length of stay. Physicians in training report experiences with telemedicine intensivists that are positive and increased patient safety. Early studies suggest that implementation of ICU telemedicine programs has been associated with lower numbers of malpractice claims and costs. The requirements for Medicare reimbursement and states with legislation addressing providing professional services by telemedicine are detailed. Conclusions: The inclusion of an ICU telemedicine program as a major part of their critical care delivery paradigm has been implemented for 11% of critically ill U.S. adults as a solution for the problem of access to adult critical care services. Implementation of an ICU telemedicine program is one practical way to increase access and reduce mortality as well as length of stay. ICU telemedicine research including comparative effectiveness studies is urgently needed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2429-2436
Number of pages8
JournalCritical care medicine
Volume42
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Financial implications
  • History
  • ICU telemedicine
  • Outcomes
  • Quality improvement
  • Risk management

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Critical Care telemedicine: Evolution and state of the art'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Lilly, C. M., Zubrow, M. T., Kempner, K. M., Reynolds, H. N., Subramanian, S., Eriksson, E. A., Jenkins, C. L., Rincon, T. A., Kohl, B. A., Groves, R. H., Cowboy, E. R., Mbekeani, K. E., McDonald, M. J., Rascona, D. A., Ries, M. H., Rogove, H. J., Badr, A. E., Kopec, I. C., Baker, K. M., ... Yared, J. P. (2014). Critical Care telemedicine: Evolution and state of the art. Critical care medicine, 42(11), 2429-2436. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000000539