COVID-19 Stay-At-Home Orders and Secondhand Smoke in Public Housing

  • Sarah Gehlert
  • , Vaughan W. Rees
  • , Kelvin Choi
  • , Peter D. Jackson
  • , Brynn E. Sheehan
  • , Richard A. Grucza
  • , Amy C. Paulson
  • , Andrew D. Plunk

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Introduction: This study aimed to better understand the inequitable impact of the pandemic by examining the associations between stay-at-home orders and indoor smoking in public housing, measured by ambient particulate matter at the 2.5-micron threshold, a marker for secondhand smoke. Methods: Particulate matter at the 2.5-micron threshold was measured in 6 public-housing buildings in Norfolk, VA from 2018 to 2022. Multilevel regression was used to compare the 7-week period of the Virginia stay-at-home order in 2020 with that period in other years. Results: Indoor particulate matter at the 2.5-micron threshold was 10.29 μg/m3 higher in 2020 (95% CI=8.51, 12.07) than in the same period in 2019, a 72% increase. Although particulate matter at the 2.5-micron threshold improved in 2021 and 2022, it remained elevated relative to the level in 2019. Conclusions: Stay-at-home orders likely led to increased indoor secondhand smoke in public housing. In light of evidence linking air pollutants, including secondhand smoke, with COVID-19, these results also provide further evidence of the disproportionate impact of the pandemic on socioeconomically disadvantaged communities. This consequence of the pandemic response is unlikely to be isolated and calls for a critical examination of the COVID-19 experience to avoid similar policy failures in future public health crises.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)512-516
    Number of pages5
    JournalAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine
    Volume65
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Sep 2023

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'COVID-19 Stay-At-Home Orders and Secondhand Smoke in Public Housing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this