Cost-Utility Analysis of rhBMP-2 Use in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

  • Amit Jain
  • , Samrat Yeramaneni
  • , Khaled M. Kebaish
  • , Micheal Raad
  • , Jeffrey L. Gum
  • , Eric O. Klineberg
  • , Hamid Hassanzadeh
  • , Michael P. Kelly
  • , Peter G. Passias
  • , Christopher P. Ames
  • , Justin S. Smith
  • , Christopher I. Shaffrey
  • , Shay Bess
  • , Virginie Lafage
  • , Steve Glassman
  • , Leah Y. Carreon
  • , Richard A. Hostin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

Study Design.Economic modeling of data from a multicenter, prospective registry.Objective.The aim of this study was to analyze the cost utility of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.Summary of Background Data.ASD surgery is expensive and presents risk of major complications. BMP is frequently used off-label to reduce the risk of pseudarthrosis.Methods.Of 522 ASD patients with fusion of five or more spinal levels, 367 (70%) had at least 2-year follow-up. Total direct cost was calculated by adding direct costs of the index surgery and any subsequent reoperations or readmissions. Cumulative quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained were calculated from the change in preoperative to final follow-up SF-6D health utility score. A decision-analysis model comparing BMP versus no-BMP was developed with pseudarthrosis as the primary outcome. Costs and benefits were discounted at 3%. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed using mixed first-order and second-order Monte Carlo simulations. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed by varying cost, probability, and QALY estimates (Alpha = 0.05).Results.BMP was used in the index surgery for 267 patients (73%). The mean (±standard deviation) direct cost of BMP for the index surgery was $14,000 ± $6400. Forty patients (11%) underwent revision surgery for symptomatic pseudarthrosis (BMP group, 8.6%; no-BMP group, 17%; P = 0.022). The mean 2-year direct cost was significantly higher for patients with pseudarthrosis ($138,000 ± $17,000) than for patients without pseudarthrosis ($61,000 ± $25,000) (P < 0.001). Simulation analysis revealed that BMP was associated with positive incremental utility in 67% of patients and considered favorable at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/QALY in >52% of patients.Conclusion.BMP use was associated with reduction in revisions for symptomatic pseudarthrosis in ASD surgery. Cost-utility analysis suggests that BMP use may be favored in ASD surgery; however, this determination requires further research.Level of Evidence: 2.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1009-1015
Number of pages7
JournalSpine
Volume45
Issue number14
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 15 2020

Keywords

  • Monte Carlo simulation
  • adult spinal deformity
  • cost-utility analysis
  • health economics
  • health utility
  • nonunion
  • pseudarthrosis
  • recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2
  • reoperation
  • revision surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-Utility Analysis of rhBMP-2 Use in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this