Abstract
Cost-effectiveness analyses allow assessment of whether marginal gains from new technology are worth increased costs. Several studies have examined cost-effectiveness of Down syndrome (DS) screening and found it to be cost-effective. Noninvasive prenatal screening also appears to be cost-effective among high-risk women with respect to DS screening, but not for the general population. Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is a genetic sequencing method superior to but more expensive than karyotype. In light of CMAs greater ability to detect genetic abnormalities, it is cost-effective when used for prenatal diagnosis of an anomalous fetus. This article covers methodology and salient issues of cost-effectiveness.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 237-248 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Clinics in Laboratory Medicine |
Volume | 36 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 1 2016 |
Keywords
- Cost-benefit analysis
- Cost-effectiveness analysis
- Down syndrome
- Economics
- Noninvasive prenatal screening
- Prenatal diagnosis-economics