TY - JOUR
T1 - Cost effectiveness of laminar flow systems for total shoulder arthroplasty
T2 - Filtering money from the OR?
AU - Davis, Daniel E.
AU - Zmistowski, Benjamin
AU - Abboud, Joseph A.
AU - Namdari, Surena
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
COPYRIGHT 2020 © BY THE ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY.
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - Background: Laminar flow ventilation systems were developed to reduce surgical contamination in joint arthroplasty to avoid periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The goals of this study are to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and economic viability of installing and maintaining a laminar flow system in an operating room. Methods: A Monte Carlo simulation was used to evaluate the cost effectiveness of laminar flow. The variables included were cost to treat PJI, incidence of PJI, cost of laminar flow, years of operating room use, and arthroplasty volume as the dependent variable. Results: Laminar flow would be financially-justified when 1,217 (SD: 319) TSA cases are performed annually with assumed 10% reduction in PJI from laminar flow and 487 (SD: 127) with assumed 25% reduction. In a high volume OR, laminar flow costs $25.24 per case (assuming 10% reduction) and $8.24 per case (assuming 25% reduction). Laminar flow would need to reduce the incidence of PJI by 35.1% (SD: 9.1) to be a cost-effective strategy. Conclusion: This analysis demonstrates the substantial arthroplasty volume and large reduction in PJI rates required to justify the installation and maintenance costs of this technology. This high cost of implementation should be considered prior to installing laminar flow systems.
AB - Background: Laminar flow ventilation systems were developed to reduce surgical contamination in joint arthroplasty to avoid periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The goals of this study are to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and economic viability of installing and maintaining a laminar flow system in an operating room. Methods: A Monte Carlo simulation was used to evaluate the cost effectiveness of laminar flow. The variables included were cost to treat PJI, incidence of PJI, cost of laminar flow, years of operating room use, and arthroplasty volume as the dependent variable. Results: Laminar flow would be financially-justified when 1,217 (SD: 319) TSA cases are performed annually with assumed 10% reduction in PJI from laminar flow and 487 (SD: 127) with assumed 25% reduction. In a high volume OR, laminar flow costs $25.24 per case (assuming 10% reduction) and $8.24 per case (assuming 25% reduction). Laminar flow would need to reduce the incidence of PJI by 35.1% (SD: 9.1) to be a cost-effective strategy. Conclusion: This analysis demonstrates the substantial arthroplasty volume and large reduction in PJI rates required to justify the installation and maintenance costs of this technology. This high cost of implementation should be considered prior to installing laminar flow systems.
KW - Cost effectiveness
KW - Laminar flow
KW - Laminar flow cost effectiveness
KW - Laminar flow efficacy
KW - Sensitivity analysis
KW - Total shoulder arthroplasty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081386046&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.22038/abjs.2018.34938.1918
DO - 10.22038/abjs.2018.34938.1918
M3 - Article
C2 - 32090144
AN - SCOPUS:85081386046
SN - 2345-4644
VL - 8
SP - 38
EP - 43
JO - Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery
JF - Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery
IS - 1
ER -