Corrigendum to “Evaluating the effectiveness of genicular radiofrequency ablation for chronic knee pain using the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global health-physical health domain: Results of a cross-sectional cohort study” [Intervent Pain Med 4 (2025) 100539] (Interventional Pain Medicine (2025) 4(1), (S2772594424001602), (10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100539))

Todd K. Brown, Marc A. Caragea, Margaret Beckwith, Amelia Ni, Ling Chen, Tyler Woodworth, Michael Blatt, Cole Cheney, Daniel Carson, Keith Kuo, Dustin Randall, Emily Y. Huang, Andrea Carefoot, Megan Mills, Amanda N. Cooper, Allison Glinka Przybysz, Taylor Burnham, Aaron M. Conger, Zachary L. McCormick

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

The authors regret reporting using an incorrect statistical test. The final paragraph of the results section should read as follows: In addition, we performed an exploratory sub-analysis using Fisher's exact test of the proportion of individuals who reported a PROMIS-GH-PH score improvement by > MCID, stratified by various categories of pain relief following prognostic genicular nerve blocks (50–79 %, 80–99 %, and 100 % relief) of concordant duration to the local anesthetic used. This analysis demonstrated no statistically significant association between prognostic genicular nerve block response and ≥2.3-point PROMIS-GH-PH score improvement (p = 1.00). The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100570
JournalInterventional Pain Medicine
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Evaluating the effectiveness of genicular radiofrequency ablation for chronic knee pain using the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global health-physical health domain: Results of a cross-sectional cohort study” [Intervent Pain Med 4 (2025) 100539] (Interventional Pain Medicine (2025) 4(1), (S2772594424001602), (10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100539))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this