In the original article, there was a mistake in Figure 2 as published. In the original article, we had stated that “all data were re-referenced to the average of Tp9 and Tp10” in the Data Analysis section of the Materials and Methods. Although this was our intention, we recently discovered that our scripts had in fact been re-referencing the data to the average of Tp9, Tp10, and Cz electrodes accidentally. Repeating the analyses using the correct referencing and same trials from the original paper yields identical results to those reported in the original article. The corrected Figure 2 appears below. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
- event-related potentials (ERP)
- monetary reward
- peer victimization
- social reward