TY - JOUR
T1 - Correlations between the alpha angle and femoral head asphericity
T2 - Implications and recommendations for the diagnosis of cam femoroacetabular impingement
AU - Harris, Michael D.
AU - Kapron, Ashley L.
AU - Peters, Christopher L.
AU - Anderson, Andrew E.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding from NIH grant R01-AR053344 and the U.S. Department of the Army grant W81XWH-06-1-0574 are gratefully acknowledged. Dr. Peters was a co-investigator of the NIH grant. Dr. Anderson was a co-investigator of the Department of the Army Grant. We acknowledge Dr. Jeff Weiss (Principal Investigator of R01-AR053344) and Dr. Kent Bachus (Principal Investigator of W8XWH-06-1-0574) for providing funding for imaging of human subjects and cadavers. Appendix A
PY - 2014/5
Y1 - 2014/5
N2 - Objective To determine the strength of common radiographic and radial CT views for measuring true femoral head asphericity. Patients and methods In 15 patients with cam femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and 15 controls, alpha angles were measured by two observers using radial CT (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°) and digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) for the: anterior-posterior (AP), standing frog-leg lateral, 45° Dunn with neutral rotation, 45° Dunn with 40° external rotation, and cross-table lateral views. A DRR validation study was performed. Alpha angles were compared between groups. Maximum deviation from a sphere of each subject was obtained from a previous study. Alpha angles from each view were correlated with maximum deviation. Results There were no significant differences between alpha angles measured on radiographs and the corresponding DRRs (p = 0.72). Alpha angles were significantly greater in patients for all views (p - 0.002). Alpha angles from the 45- Dunn with 40- external rotation, cross-table lateral, and 60- radial views had the strongest correlations with maximum deviation (r = 0.831; r = 0.823; r = 0.808, respectively). The AP view had the weakest correlation (r = 0.358). Conclusion DRRs were a validated means to simulate hip radiographs. The 45- Dunn with 40- external rotation, cross-table lateral, and 60 radial views best visualized femoral asphericity. Although commonly used, the AP view did not visualize cam deformities well. Overall, the magnitude of the alpha angle may not be indicative of the size of the deformity. Thus, 3D reconstructions and measurements of asphericity could improve the diagnosis of cam FAI.
AB - Objective To determine the strength of common radiographic and radial CT views for measuring true femoral head asphericity. Patients and methods In 15 patients with cam femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and 15 controls, alpha angles were measured by two observers using radial CT (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°) and digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) for the: anterior-posterior (AP), standing frog-leg lateral, 45° Dunn with neutral rotation, 45° Dunn with 40° external rotation, and cross-table lateral views. A DRR validation study was performed. Alpha angles were compared between groups. Maximum deviation from a sphere of each subject was obtained from a previous study. Alpha angles from each view were correlated with maximum deviation. Results There were no significant differences between alpha angles measured on radiographs and the corresponding DRRs (p = 0.72). Alpha angles were significantly greater in patients for all views (p - 0.002). Alpha angles from the 45- Dunn with 40- external rotation, cross-table lateral, and 60- radial views had the strongest correlations with maximum deviation (r = 0.831; r = 0.823; r = 0.808, respectively). The AP view had the weakest correlation (r = 0.358). Conclusion DRRs were a validated means to simulate hip radiographs. The 45- Dunn with 40- external rotation, cross-table lateral, and 60 radial views best visualized femoral asphericity. Although commonly used, the AP view did not visualize cam deformities well. Overall, the magnitude of the alpha angle may not be indicative of the size of the deformity. Thus, 3D reconstructions and measurements of asphericity could improve the diagnosis of cam FAI.
KW - Alpha angle
KW - Cam femoroacetabular impingement
KW - Diagnosis
KW - Digitally reconstructed radiograph
KW - Femur asphericity
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84897382619
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.02.005
DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.02.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 24613175
AN - SCOPUS:84897382619
SN - 0720-048X
VL - 83
SP - 788
EP - 796
JO - European Journal of Radiology
JF - European Journal of Radiology
IS - 5
ER -