Correction to: Testing the construct validity of competing measurement approaches to probed mind-wandering reports (Behavior Research Methods, (2021), 53, 6, (2372-2411), 10.3758/s13428-021-01557-x)

Michael J. Kane, Bridget A. Smeekens, Matt E. Meier, Matthew S. Welhaf, Natalie E. Phillips

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this article, the content of footnote 6 was omitted. The omitted footnote text read as follows: "6. Cheyne et al. (2009) may provide a starting point for this measurement pursuit, as their model of attention lapses proposed different types of performance errors to result from different gradations (or severities) of attentional withdrawal from the SART."

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2743
Number of pages1
JournalBehavior Research Methods
Volume53
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to: Testing the construct validity of competing measurement approaches to probed mind-wandering reports (Behavior Research Methods, (2021), 53, 6, (2372-2411), 10.3758/s13428-021-01557-x)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this