TY - JOUR
T1 - Coronary stenting in diabetic patients
T2 - Results from the ROSETTA registry
AU - Huynh, Thao
AU - Eisenberg, Mark J.
AU - Deligonul, Ubeydullah
AU - Tsang, Janius
AU - Okrainec, Karen
AU - Schechter, David
AU - Lefkovits, Jeffrey
AU - Mak, Koon Hou
AU - Brown, David L.
AU - Brieger, David
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported in part by the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec. M. J. E. is a research scholar of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Objective: Diabetes mellitus is associated with high rates of restenosis and adverse outcomes after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). It is unclear whether coronary stenting reduces adverse events in diabetic patients after PTCA. Our purpose was to determine whether coronary stenting improves clinical event rates in diabetic patients after PTCA. Methods: The Routine Versus Selective Exercise Treadmill Testing After Angioplasty (ROSETTA) registry was a prospective multicenter observational study examining functional testing and adverse outcomes after successful PTCA. Results: Among the 791 patients enrolled, 180 were diabetic. A total of 90 diabetics received stents while the remaining 90 patients did not. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar between the 2 groups of patients. However, patients with stents were more likely to have complex lesions, whereas those without stents were more likely to undergo atherectomy and have greater residual coronary stenosis. At 6-month follow-up, the composite end point defined as cardiac death, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, need for repeat PTCA, or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) occurred in 25.0% of stented and 22.2% of nonstented diabetic patients (P not significant [NS]). A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that coronary stenting was not associated with a reduced incidence of the composite end point among diabetic patients (odds ratio 0.97, 95% Cl 0.46-2.05, P NS). Conclusion: Coronary stenting does not improve clinical event rates in diabetic patients after PTCA.
AB - Objective: Diabetes mellitus is associated with high rates of restenosis and adverse outcomes after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). It is unclear whether coronary stenting reduces adverse events in diabetic patients after PTCA. Our purpose was to determine whether coronary stenting improves clinical event rates in diabetic patients after PTCA. Methods: The Routine Versus Selective Exercise Treadmill Testing After Angioplasty (ROSETTA) registry was a prospective multicenter observational study examining functional testing and adverse outcomes after successful PTCA. Results: Among the 791 patients enrolled, 180 were diabetic. A total of 90 diabetics received stents while the remaining 90 patients did not. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar between the 2 groups of patients. However, patients with stents were more likely to have complex lesions, whereas those without stents were more likely to undergo atherectomy and have greater residual coronary stenosis. At 6-month follow-up, the composite end point defined as cardiac death, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, need for repeat PTCA, or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) occurred in 25.0% of stented and 22.2% of nonstented diabetic patients (P not significant [NS]). A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that coronary stenting was not associated with a reduced incidence of the composite end point among diabetic patients (odds ratio 0.97, 95% Cl 0.46-2.05, P NS). Conclusion: Coronary stenting does not improve clinical event rates in diabetic patients after PTCA.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035210313&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1067/mhj.2001.119381
DO - 10.1067/mhj.2001.119381
M3 - Article
C2 - 11717597
AN - SCOPUS:0035210313
SN - 0002-8703
VL - 142
SP - 960
EP - 964
JO - American heart journal
JF - American heart journal
IS - 6
ER -